The Black Rod

The origin of the Usher of the Black Rod goes back to early fourteenth century England . Today, with no royal duties to perform, the Usher knocks on the doors of the House of Commons with the Black Rod at the start of Parliament to summon the members. The rod is a symbol for the authority of debate in the upper house. We of The Black Rod have since 2005, adopted the symbol to knock some sense and the right questions into the heads of Legislators, pundits, and other opinion makers.

Name:
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

We are citizen journalists in Winnipeg. When not breaking exclusive stories, we analyze news coverage by the mainstream media and highlight bias, ignorance, incompetence, flawed logic, missed angles and, where warranted, good work. We serve as the only overall news monitors in the province of Manitoba. We do the same with politicians (who require even more monitoring.) EMAIL: black_rod_usher@yahoo.com

Thursday, January 25, 2018

It's time to call the family to pay their last respects. Manitoba Hydro is done.

A perfect storm is hitting Manitoba Hydro. Insolvency is inevitable. 

Eight months ago we reported that Hydro was on its deathbed, based on the testimony of the utility's own witnesses at a hearing of the Manitoba Public Utilities Board.

http://blackrod.blogspot.ca/2017/08/manitoba-hydro-is-on-its-deathbed-there.html
Since then the patient's condition has deteriorated rapidly. It's time to call the family to pay their last respects. 

Last week the Bank of Canada announced that the years of low interest rates are officially over. The Bank raised the bank rate by one quarter of one percent. It was the third rate hike within a year.  It's just the start.

The Bank of Canada expects at least one and possibly two more rate hikes in 2018.  That will bring the bank rate to about half of where the Bank wants it to be.  You read that right---half.  The Bank of Canada wants the bank rate to steady out at 2.5 percent, the lower end of a range the Bank feels is right for a healthy economy.

Hydro lawyer Patti Ramage told the PUB last August that Manitoba Hydro "is today borrowing cash for interest annually on the debt being borrowed to build (Bipole III). It's a huge number. We're talking 150 million, 175 million."
 "... we are borrowing money to fund our core Basic operations. That is an unsustainable practice...".

 ".. interest expense will soon consume 70 odd percent of every domestic dollar. 70 percent of every domestic dollar is going to go to interest expense."

"It doesn't take much of an error on the interest rate forecast for that to move up to a hundred percent or more."

 "And we still have a business to run. We have to pay our operating costs, power purchases, water rentals, capital taxes, and by no means least of all, we have to replenish aging infrastructure."


She added: "... Manitoba Hydro has $12 billion to borrow over the next five (5) years. Extremely modest increases in borrowing costs against plan can quickly reduce Manitoba Hydro's income by fifty (50) to even a hundred million dollars per year."   

Doubling the bank rate is hardly an "extremely modest increase in borrowing costs."

Have you been outside lately?  Did you notice something missing? 

Hint: there's hardly any snow.

That's very, very bad news for Hydro.  The PUB was told last year that only two things were keeping Manitoba Hydro from insolvency. One was low interest rates (see above.) The other was high water levels which were bringing Hydro unexpected revenue. No snow, means no water, means no power to sell, means no bonus revenue.

But its worse. The last drought in Manitoba was 14 years ago. Weather cycles call for a drought roughly every 14 years. Uh oh.

Hey, you professional journalists:  Start asking Hydro what they've done with the $1.5- to $2 billion they squeezed out of rate payers following the last drought to be the contingency for the next drought.  

Have they already spent it to prop up their unsustainable NDP megaprojects? Is that why they're already saying they need even greater rate hikes in the event of an inevitable drought?

The world price for oil is climbing again, which is good news for Canada. The Canadian  dollar is a petrocurrency, so every increase in oil prices boosts the value of the Canadian dollar.  But Manitoba sells its hydropower in American dollars. So every rise in the value of Canadian money, means we earn less for our power from our American customers.

You may have read somewhere that the U.S. is about to become the world's biggest exporter of oil and natural gas.  The reason is fracking. You know, fracking, the process that Manitoba Hydro "experts" dismissed ten years ago as a fad that wouldn't affect the prices Hydro was going to get from the Yankee buyers of our green energy.

Today, the price they pay for hydroelectric power is linked to the price of natural gas which, thanks to fracking, is near all-time lows. 

So,  reading the patient's chart:  

* interest rates up, Hydro's costs way up
* precipitation extremely low, a drought more than likely, sales evaporate, revenue disappears
* the exchange rate rising, profit margin squeezing daily
* fracking boom, hydroelectric sales only at bargain basement prices

And that's without saying a word about rising costs.

On Monday, Manitoba Hydro finally confessed that the cost of the unnecessary Keeyask generating station could climb to $9.9 billion, although they still pretend to believe they can deliver the megaproject at a cost of more than $1 billion less.  Ha ha ha. Injecting levity into a grave situation is not always a good thing.

A company hired by the PUB to review Hydro's runaway dam building projects predicts that at the rate construction is going the Keeyask station will be a year late and will cost $10.5 billion. 

Here's how they arrived at that conclusion: they looked at the amount of work done already at Keeyask and compared it to the amount of work that should be completed on a project of this size at this stage of construction. 

They determined that the contractor is way behind where he should be.  

Unless he can somehow catch up, the project won't be finished for at least a year later than it is scheduled to be ready and costs will keep escalating. They estimate the final cost will be $4 billion more than Hydro's initial claim that the project would cost $6.2 billion (not $6.5 billion as the Winnipeg Free Press reported incorrectly). 

http://www.pubmanitoba.ca/v1/nfat/pdf/hydro_application/appendix_02_4_developing_the_keeyask_and_conawapa_capital_cost_estimates.pdf  Page 23.

We reported Hydro's confession eight months ago that it doesn't have the money to pay for Bipole III, or for Keeyask, and they will need a billion dollars more in revenue within 5 years just to cover the annual borrowing costs of these megaprojects. That's a billion dollars every year more than they raise now.

And that was  determined before the interest rate increases--past, present and future---and the pending drought and the  escalating cost of construction.

The next sound you hear will be the squeal of flatlining as credit rating agencies pull the plug.


EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeee...........

Labels: , ,

Friday, January 12, 2018

Winnipeg Mayor Brian Bowman - from Bold to Scold


What a start to the new year---Winnipeg's pipsqueak Mayor gets bitch-slapped in public by the Winnipeg police department.  You don't see that every day.

When Brian Bowman rebuked the police service this week  for loaning the police helicopter to a movie company (at a full cost-recovery price) for a short scene he demonstrated his limited grasp of how the city works. 
 
Just as his city hall colleague Councillor I'M-MARTY-MORANTZ-AND-I'M-A-LAWYER learned to his chagrin two years ago, the police department reports to the police commission, not the mayor or city council.  Morantz had tried to browbeat a senior police official at a committee meeting, but was quickly informed by the police chief of the way things run and the next day ate crow for breakfast, lunch and supper.

Bowman was delivered a hefty helping of his own on Monday when the police responded to his lecture about extending police resources to Hollywood directors. 

"This is what any large city would do if you're trying to attract the film industry here, and we have been very successful, from my understanding, in doing that for a long time...It's simply beyond me why this is an issue," police spokesman Const. Rob Carver told  reporters, according to the CBC.

For the record, the helicopter was flown to La Salle, Manitoba, for a scene in the movie 'The Parts You Lose' being shot there. That's a whopping 20 miles (32 kilometres) past Winnipeg city limits. The helicopter flies at up to 380 kilometres an hour and could respond to any call for service in the city in 5 minutes.

Why the mayor decided to stick his nose where it doesn't belong is a mystery, but an even bigger question is: what happened to Bold Brian, the man who ran for mayor four years ago?

You remember him, don't you?  He was going to be the "cool" mayor.The guy who loved heavy metal bands, who dodged bullets in a bus hijacking in Mexico, who was going to transform Winnipeg into a city of the future with rapid transit extending into every corner of the metropolis and wi-fi on every speedy bus to link everyone to the universe.  How cool is that?

Three years later, he's the scold, the stickler for rules even if he's wrong, the drudge who's only success as a mayor is raising taxes, frontage fees, water rates, bus fares, and speeding tickets. Remember how he was the candidate for mayor who promised lower taxes than SpeNDP candidate Judy Wasylycia-Leis?  You've got to laugh to keep from crying.

With Bowman looking ahead at running for re-election in 2018, the question is how does he rate as a mayor?  To be fair, we're going to look for the answer from the only man who knows---Brian Bowman.

Anyone running for office delivers a barrage of promises for what he or she is going to do if elected, then hopes voters forget most of what was promised. In the case of Brian Bowman, one solemn pledge stands out, and its that alone that delivers the measure of the mayor.

"I'll go as far as I have to, to restore Winnipeggers' trust and faith in city hall," Bowman told the CBC and other news outlets in year-end 2014 interviews. 

His predecessor Sam Katz's final years in office were characterized by scandal---rigged bids on multi-million dollar construction projects, preferential treatment for an investor of the mayor's baseball team, a suspicious purchase of a million dollar house for cash by the mayor from an officer that that investor's business, damning audits, ending with an RCMP investigation into allegations of kickbacks for a sweetheart deal on the construction of a new headquarters for the Winnipeg Police Service.

Winnipeggers were shell-shocked by the time of Bowman's election and welcomed his promise for clean government.  How's he done?

Uh oh.

Bowman's third year in office ended with city hall under a cloud of controversy that's engulfed city councillors, the mayor, the city's CAO, various city administrators (now gone), and a prominent developer. Sound familiar?

It stemmed from a plan to extend a road in Charleswood (called the Sterling Lyon Parkway).  The extension would mean expropriation of 96 homes. The homeowners were surpised to find out about the plan for their properties because public consultations held by the city never mentioned it. Sound familiar?

Of course it does. This is the same city scam that's been run for years. Take the Disraeli Freeway replacement in Sam Katz's day.  

Phony public consultations led neighbouring residents to think they had a choice of one of three options for a new bridge. They were surprised to learn the city actually planned to build a fourth bridge design, costing more than residents approved,  which had been planned for years but had never been made public. 

City officials used the same template in Charleswood under Brian Bowman. 
-  Phony public consultations. 
-  Three options. 
-  A fourth planned all along chosen to go ahead. 

Only they hit a snag. They came up against people who had money. Who could hire lawyers and researchers and planners of their own. And the scheme fell apart in the bright light of day, but not before uncovering documentation suggesting that their own councillor knew about option four but didn't tell them. Councillor Marty Moranz plans to call for a city audit of the project, that's now on hold.

Internal emails also disclosed that the mayor at one point intervened personally to stop the road extension project (temporarily) for an undisclosed reason.  Did his intervention have anything to do with his mother, who lives in the area and who attended at least one public hearing?  You've got to admire a man who loves his mother.

Anything else? There's the Parking Authority which keeps getting caught gouging drivers. Most recently they planned to ticket Saturday parkers who thought the stickers that read "2 hours complimentary parking on Saturday" meant 2 hours free parking.  Oh, no, said the Parking Authority. It obviously meant pay for two hours and get two hours additional for free. What's the matter with people? Can't they understand plain English? 

There's the North End sewage-treatment plant that continues to hemmorhage money.  In 2016 it was estimated to cost almost $800 million. We wish. The current estimate is $1.4 billion and only God knows when it will be completed. Apparently everybody we've hired so far doesn't know what they're doing. Bowman is unperturbed. 

What's a billion? Bold, that's what.

The RCMP investigation into the construction of the Winnipeg Police headquarters has entered its third year.  It has expanded to include construction of the Canada Post Mail Processing Plant near the airport, which was built by the same company involved in the police HQ project.

And remember how Winnipeg wound up building a firehall on land it didn't own on Taylor Avenue in River Heights?  A bylaw passed in 2014 called for expropriation of the land. The city was to receive recommendations early in 2015 on what to pay. 

The city clerk's website says the matter is still "active", which means the city still owns a firehall built on land it doesn't own, three years after Bowman was elected.

Do voters have more trust in city hall than they did before the last mayoral election?

Bwahahahaha.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, September 25, 2017

What's his story? The silent witness in the Wab Kinew abuse charges scandal.


There's an important witness that we haven't heard from in the furor over whether NDP leader Wab Kinew roughed up  his girlfriend  so badly that she could hardly walk back when he was attending university.

His name is Wab Kinew.

His ex-girlfriend has given reporters her story of what happened one night in 2003 culminating in being hurled across their apartment with such force that she landed on her hands and knees and suffered painful rugburn. She fled their home in fear the next day, she said.

He's missed no opportunity to say that that never happened, leaving Manitobans with the only conclusion --- he's saying she is lying.  Lying today and lying when she pressed charges (which were laid by the RCMP and eventually stayed the following year by the Crown).

But Kinew has never given his account of what did happen. And Winnipeg's 'professional journalists'  haven't asked for his version of that night.  There's no excuse for this oversight. Getting both sides of a story is a basic tenet of journalism.

Did Kinew leave a clue to his behavior  in his memoir The Reason You Walk?

"I developed a mean streak. After a few beers I would shift from cracking jokes and having a good time to trying to mess with people. I would get in someone's face and insult them until they either backed down or fought me.  Either way, the goal was the same --- feed my ego." (Page 69-70)

*********************
Has anyone noticed the irony of having the New Democratic Party led by an almost-one-percenter?

Wab Kinew released his tax information just before the leadership vote, showing he earned $205,000 in 2016.   The cutoff to be a one-percenter,--- the top income earners in the country---is $225,000.   

Kinew was $20,000 short, but he's still a two-percenter, at least.
And Kinew may be a good socialist, but that doesn't mean he can't use tax "loopholes" to pad his own pocket.

He made $81,900 in book royalties, but used a tax dodge of having the money paid into a corporation which then paid him the money as dividends.  

As dividends, half the money is not taxable.
Not bad, eh. More than $40,000 tax-free.  

Good socialists believe in income sharing---yours, not theirs.

Labels: ,

Thursday, September 21, 2017

Contradictions in NDP leader Wab Kinew's tale; Winnipeg's iconic newsman says Congrats



Delegates to the Manitoba NDP's leadership convention dispersed this past weekend with two  images in their mindseye:

* their new leader dragging a woman down a hallway by her hair, and

* their new leader throwing a young woman across a room so roughly that she suffers physical injury

Neither image is palatable to NDP members, so over the past few days they've cobbled together a new narrative to reconcile their new leader, Wab Kinew, with the fact that one of his old girlfriends had him charged with domestic abuse.

He's changed, they chorus. They're quick to say they believe the girlfriend's story of being roughed up by Kinew---"believe the woman' is now a basic tenet of the NDP--- but...  But he's changed.  He's now a model of how a man with a troubled past can re-invent himself as a decent, honourable husband, father, and political leader, say his supporters.

But...

Yes, there's a 'but' from critics of Kinew and his blind endorsers.

Wab Kinew says the abuse didn't happen.  The charges were investigated and dropped, he'll tell you.  He doesn't want you to 'believe the woman.' She's a liar, is his position. 

Think about what he's saying.  

If his ex-girlfriend is lying about the abuse now, she was lying about it when she spoke to RCMP 14 years ago.  And making a false statement to police is a crime.  She should have been charged and sent to jail, not him, is the only conclusion.  Kinew has managed to turn himself into the victim, the golden status in the NDP. He's the victim of the awful lying woman, is his position.

Kinew's supporters, especially the "strong NDP women" like fellow MLA Nahanni Fontaine, who believe the woman are put in the position of saying that it's he who is the liar.  But by allowing him to denigrate his ex, they are abetting him.

And he's doing it NOW. Not 14 years ago.   

The argument that it happened so long ago it's time to let it go doesn't hold.  Kinew is challenging her credibility NOW and doing it with the cloak of leader of the Manitoba NDP.

He hasn't changed because he says there's nothing to change from.  He didn't do it, is his bedrock position.  Change what? Change why? 

Note that none of the "professional journalists" who have spoken with Kinew after his leadership victory asked him for his account of what happened the night of the alleged domestic abuse.

That's just as well for him because he's shown a selective memory of his past transgressions.

In the past few days the audio recording of a sentencing hearing for Kinew in 2004 surfaced. The transcript contained a completely different account of an assault on a cab driver than the account Kinew related in his best-selling memoir "The Reason You Walk."

Now, here we come to the defence of Wab, minor as it is. His account and the court account can be seen as two halves of the same story and they're not mutually exclusive.  But what he left out of his half is instructive.

Kinew admitted he was drunk and tried to skip out on the taxi fare when a cabbie grabbed him and they exchanged punches before police arrived and arrested the future leader of the NDP.

In court, however, the story told the judge was different. 

 Wab, drunk, had been berating the driver with racist comments during the ride.  When the cab stopped, Kinew got out, went to the driver and suckerpunched him through his open window.  When the drive got out of the car, Kinew knocked him to the ground and started kicking him when he was down. 

Two more unpalatable images for the NDP faithful---a racist Wab Kinew kicking a downed man.

Kinew never apologized for his cowardly kicks, nor for his racist comments--in his book or in person.

Kinew's book may contain some clues as to who is telling the truth about the night of alleged abuse that led to the charges against him.

After his girlfriend left him and got him charged, he found another. They had a baby but "after the baby arrived things soured between us."  They "muddled through for more than a year", he wrote, until she left him "after one of our arguments".  

He quickly found a new girl, and even after reconciling with the mother of his son, he "did not stop seeing the other woman."

Eventually,  one child later, they (the girlfriend, not the 'other woman') broke up for good. Another argument. On Christmas Day. "I knew there would be more arguing and fighting in front of my sons if we tried to reconcile again."

He took up with another, enjoyed her company, until  "(I)t came to an end. Perhaps I was too quick to anger."  Oh?  She, too,  broke up with him. (Though they eventually got together again---"I told her about the ways I had changed"and they got married.)

Three women, each of whom left him at some point.  Two of these relationships began and ended after he says he stopped drinking and was attending Alcoholic Anonymous meetings.

 Arguments. Anger. Abuse?

In his memoir Kinew says his troubled Twenties were a reflection of his oversized ego. But, of course, he says, 'he's changed'.

Oh?

In the last mayoral election candidate Gord Steeves was attacked for a post on Facebook by his wife who said she was reluctant to go downtown because of "drunken Indians"---(like the 21 year old Wab Kinew?)  At the time, Kinew had not yet apologized for misogynystic and homophobic rap lyrics (as he hadn't enterered politics), but we still didn't know about his racist taunts and charges of domestic abuse. 

Kinew,  on his high horse, sneered at Steeves and tweeted:

Wab Kinew ‏@WabKinew 22m 
Tweet me when Gord Steeves does the right thing and drops out of the race.
The difference between them, he sniffed, was that his errors were in the past and he had apologized for them, but Steeves' apology was too recent to be believed.
Well, it turns out that Kinew's secrets are still trickling out slowly and even after 14 years he's refusing to apologize. 

Perhaps he can swallow his ego long enough to apologize to Gord Steeves.
*************************
Exactly one week ago nobody was interested in what the woman who laid charges of domestic abuse against Wab Kinew had to say. Now that's all everybody's talking about when his name comes up.
It only happened because The Black Rod asked the question "why are all the professional journalists in town ignoring her?"  One reader thought we asked the right question of the right people. Maybe you've heard of him..,
Members of The Black Rod:

          Congratulations on your outing of several
incidents in the life of new NDP leader Wab Kinew,
which were subtly "missed" by professional
journalists until you forced them to do some
more legwork.

Peter Warren Investigative Journalism
(PWIJ Inc.),
Please see our webpage: www.peterwarren.ca
Telephone: (250) 380-PWIJ (7945)
Specialty: Cold-Case Murders
and/or Wrongful Convictions

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, September 16, 2017

Wab Kinew's accuser finally gets to speak. Will NDP delegates hear...



Shamed by The Black Rod, Winnipeg's professional "journalists" finally decided there was something to report about an assault charge Manitoba NDP leadership candidate Wab Kinew didn't mention in his memoir.

These "professionals" sat on their hands for almost three weeks after the revelation that Kinew had been hiding the existence of domestic abuse charges from 2003. Kinew said the charges were dropped because they were false, so the press stopped digging.

Only after The Black Rod questioned why the woman's voice wasn't being heard did the professional journalists stir themselves. Within a day, Steve Lambert of Canadian Press had located the complainant and her story was picked up by the rest of the news herd. And what a story it turned out to be!

“I went to the police because he assaulted me; physically injured (me)." she told Lambert.

Tara Hart is her name. And she isn't backing down an inch on her claim of being assaulted by Kinew. 

She says she lived with him for a year when one day in May, 2003, they got into an argument and he flung her across the room. She landed on her knees so hard she suffered rug burn. She was so scared of him that she packed a single bag and fled the home as soon as she could.  She called the RCMP and he was charged.

He called her three weeks ago when the secret of the domestic abuse charges against him began circulating in Winnipeg to tell her she might be getting calls from reporters. But when he insisted nothing happened between them that night, she hung up on him.

For his part, Kinew declares that Tara Hart is lying. The matter was investigated and the charges were dropped, he says disingenuously.

As we reported, the RCMP did investigate the complaint---and then laid the charges.  Hart says she only made one complaint, but there were two charges. That suggests something she told police in May about an incident in April supported a second charge.  

The details of that incident are still unknown, with Wab Kinew keeping mum and the press asleep.
 
His supporters are twisting themselves into pretzels trying to dismiss Hart's story without joining Wab in actually calling her a liar.

NDP MLA Nahanni Fontaine, the uber-feminist who once denounced a women's shelter for taking money from a fundraiser at a burlesque show, now gladly defends a man accused of assaulting an indigenous woman.  

While she believes the woman, she told CBC, Fontaine is willing to throw her under the bus if it means Kinew will win the NDP leadership, women's solidarity be damned. 

University of Manitoba law professor Karen Busby implied in an interview with CBC (where Wab Kinew was employed, a fact they no longer mention) that maybe there were "inconsistencies" with the complaint against him. That and a reluctance to testify by the complainant are the only two reasons why a charge would be stayed, she said.

Wrong.  As we pointed out in The Black Rod, the guidelines for prosecutors on domestic abuse charges back then were to proceed with trial unless the complainant admitted she lied or refused to go to court. Tara Hart reaffirms that she was assaulted, but says she didn't want to go to court then and wishes the matter would go away now. That's why the charges were stayed.

The legal charges expired 13 years ago, but the matter is now before a jury of public opinion.

Who to believe?

"I've been very open and honest that I was in a  difficult period in my life, when I was in my early 20's" he told a Winnipeg Free Press reporter. "the person who is running to lead the NDP ... is the person that I am today, it's not the man that I was when I was 20 or 21 years old."
 
In his memoir, Kinew says he graduated from the University of Winnipeg in May, 2003, the time of the alleged assault.  He admits that around that time he began a period of behaviour that got him into trouble with the law repeatedly.  Fights, car chases, cashing another man's money order and stealing the money, drunk driving.  He's smartened up, he says, and quit drinking.

But you know what they say about alcohol.  It doesn't make you an asshole; it just magnifies the asshole already in you.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

Why won't the NDP listen to the woman who accused Wab Kinew of domestic abuse?




Not so fast, Wabanakwut.

Two and a half weeks ago some skeletons that NDP leadership candidate Wab Kinew had hidden away at the bottom of his closet lurched back to life.   

It scared the hell out of him. But not as scared as he's going to be.

Kinew had built a political career out of being the holier-than-thou candidate in the holier-than-thou Party. He turned his criminal record of drunk driving and assaults in his Twenties into an asset by claiming that he had seen the light, had reformed, and was now, in his Thirties, a paragon of virtue starting with taking ownership and responsibility for all his transgressions.

Look, he said, how transparent I am with my past faults. How can you doubt my sincerity?

But Kinew had to do some fancy tapdancing in late August when it was revealed that he hadn't been completely honest about his run-ins with the law. It turned out that he had concealed a pair of  arrests for domestic violence.

Violence against women, especially aboriginal women, is the third rail of the NDP. Touch it and instant political death. Just ask Maples MLA Mohinder Saran who was turfed from the already pathetically small NDP caucus on mere allegations of sexual harassment.

But the NDP caucus, and the mainstream media, gave Wab a pass on his own history of actual criminal charges of domestic assault. 

In fact, former NDP justice minister Gord Mackintosh said the revelation of the charges might actually be helpful for Kinew among party members in his run for leadership of the party. 

"It remains to be seen whether Steve’s hit on Wab strengthens support for Wab — some in the party were offended by that," he said in the Winnipeg Free Press.

Kinew, himself, went on the attack. There were no apologies this time.

"There was no substance to the allegations. It was investigated. It was dropped," he said.
Or, as a rapper would say, 'she lied, the bitch; makes my trigger finger itch.'
Here's where the story gets interesting.


Three years ago, Wab Kinew was the guest host on CBC-radio's national morning show Q. It was shortly after the regular host, Jian Ghomeshi, had been fired. Ghomeshi was eventually charged with multiple counts of sexual assault. (He was acquitted of all charges.)
Kinew opened the show with an essay titled: There's no acceptable level of violence against women.

He was, of course, being holier-than-thou, as usual. But we got to thinking---shouldn't he be held to his own standards?
We went back to those charges of domestic assault against Wabanakwut Kinew.

The first thing that struck us was that there were two charges. Not two charges stemming from the same incident.  But two charges, one month apart
So the unnamed woman in question called police on Wab in April, 2003, saw him released, probably on his own recognizance, then called police on him again in May.

And the second time was for a second complaint of assault. It was not for a breach of recognizance as would be the case if he came to her house when the court required him to stay away. Two separate assaults on two calendar months.
We found the Manitoba Department of Justice guidelines for Crown attorneys regarding domestic violence that were in effect when the charges were laid.
It was the time of "zero tolerance."

"The Attorney General's policy regarding domestic violence is straightforward: there is  zero tolerance. This means the discretion conferred on those responsible for enforcing the criminal law ought, at each stage of the proceedings, to be exercised in favour of sanctions where a lawful basis to proceed exists. In practical terms, this requires that where there is evidence to support charges, they will be laid. Where there is evidence 
to support conviction, the case will proceed to trial as soon as possible." read the policy directive.
"...Domestic assault, for the purposes of this policy, is defined as physical or sexual assault or the threat of physical or sexual assault of a victim by a person with whom they have or have had an intimate relationship, whether or not they are legally married or living together at the time of the assault or threat."

"...Where a victim of domestic abuse seeks help, police agencies throughout the province are expected by the Attorney General to respond appropriately by treating the situation as a crime and not simply as a "family dispute."



"...Police officers may, and under this policy will be expected to, lay criminal charges where there are reasonable grounds to believe an offence under the Criminal Code or any other law has been committed. That is not to say that charges should be laid automatically, whether or not there is evidence to support criminal proceedings: the 
Criminal Code requires that, before laying charges, a peace officer must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds, based on the available evidence, to do so. Where such grounds do exist, however, charges should be laid. "

This appears to be in direct contradiction of Kinew's statement

 "There was no substance to the allegations. It was investigated. It was dropped."


It appears the police did investigate and did determine that based on the evidence there was reason to believe a crime was committed.

To say the charges were dropped is problematic. 

The charges were stayed, which, in laymen's terms, means the prosecution of the matter was suspended for a year and then abandoned.  The intent was to keep Kinew on a short leash for a year to guarantee that he kept the peace, probably because of a second charge being laid so soon after the first. The government guidelines stated "proceedings should not be terminated unless it is clear that there is no longer sufficient evidence to support charges".


This was followed by a lengthy discourse on when charges should be stayed which boiled down to:
-  whenever the complainant wouldn't testify (and even then only if there were no other witnesses or physical evidence), 

-  couldn't be found, or 

-  admitted she lied to police.

Which was the case in Queen v. Kinew?


********

Wab says he doesn't want to discuss the matter any more to protect the privacy of the complainant.

Okay, we don't need the name of the woman. 

But we do need the details.

The NDP is in the position of possibly electing an alleged woman-beater as the leader of their party.  The delegates need more information on his secret past.

Two things need to happen immediately:

A) Wab Kinew must reveal the circumstances of the charges against him.  

The court charges come with what's known as an "information" which contains detailed allegations of who did what to whom which precipitated the laying of the charge.  

Did both charges involve verbal assault (shouts, threats) or physical assaults (pushing, grabbing)? Or was it more (black eyes, bruising)?  Remember that at the time  the domestic assault charges were laid, Kinew, by his own autobiographical account, was a mean drunk who was quick with his fists.

B) The New Democratic Party must get a signed statement from the complainant in which she either admits she lied to police about the assaults as Kinew says she did, or she stands by her complaints against him. The Party should have no preference to what she says.

But hearing from the woman is vital in the court of public opinion. 

He's called her a liar. Why shouldn't her voice be heard as loud as his?

Labels: , ,