Skip to main content

IIU whitewashes Bradley Singer shooting by cops

Police in Manitoba have, like James Bond, a licence to kill, according to the latest report from the provincial police watchdog, the IIU (Independent Investigation Unit).

That's the shocking conclusion of a mandatory, and seriously slanted, investigation into the police killing of 59-year-old Bradley Singer in his home on Magnus Avenue a year ago.

Singer was an innocent man, alone, probably asleep, bothering nobody, when police arrived at his door just before dawn in February 2024. He was diagnosed as suffering from schizophrenia, magnified by extreme paranoia. Police had come with an order to take him to see a doctor who was concerned that Singer's mental health was deteriorating.

But, through a series of misjudgements and missteps, about two hours later Singer was dead, peppered with at least six police bullets fired at point blank range.

https://blackrod.blogspot.com/2024/02/charge-em-magnus-avenue-shooting-by-cops.html

We knew the IIU had something to hide when they stealthily slipped the report of their "investigation" out the back door at the last minute on a Friday afternoon.

It's a common practice by government and public bodies to release a report they don't want anyone to question on a Friday, when reporters have gone home for the weekend, when it's too late to fully read, when it's impossible to get anyone to comment on it because they too have gone home.

What were they hiding?

The IIU had only one question to answer: why didn't police at any point back off, surround the house, and call in a mental health professional, a family member, or a police negotiator to calm Singer and resolve the stand-off peaceably?

The police "watchdog" ignored the question, raising instead the straw man that police were so scared of Singer they had no choice but to kill him in his own home.

Make no mistake. The Winnipeg Police Service was 100 percent responsible for the unnecessary killing of Bradley Singer. By refusing to even discuss the WPS failure to de-escalate their confrontation with Singer, the IIU destroyed any credibility it had.

Their report is a WHITEWASH.

The Independent Investigation Unit obviously cannot be trusted to be "independent". No future report by the body can be believed. The agency must be dissolved and replaced.

Let's review the facts provided by the IIU it its one-sided investigation.

* Two policemen knocked on Singer's front door at 7:36 a.m. the morning he was shot to death. Getting no answer they tried the side door. Singer had a cot by the side door, so was likely sleeping there. He opened the door, saw the policemen and slammed the door shut.

* The police had come to serve Singer with a Mental Health Order allowing them to take him into custody so he could be assessed by a physician. Given Singer's reluctance to go with the police, one of the officers phoned his supervisor to tell her Singer was "was not going to co-operate and additional resources may be required" as the report put it.

* While he was on the phone, Singer came out his side door and whacked the door frame with a crowbar, saying "You know what this is for". He went back in. Anyone with any social skills knows this meant "Go away, leave me alone."

* Two other police cars arrived. There were now six police officers besieging the house. The incident had escalated one step.

One of the first officers tried to pull the door frame away from the wall, but gave up after opening a 3-inch gap.

His partner had his Taser out and he told the other officer to pull his gun "in case (Singer) attempted to attack them." Where Singer had been peacefully sleeping less than half an hour earlier, he now faced a policeman ready to shoot him. The situation had escalated another step.

* To make the police go away, Singer squirted a fire extinguisher in the direction of the police through the gap made by the officer in the door frame of the side door. The police retreated from the door.

* The acting patrol sergeant arrived, making it seven police officers at the house.

She was told somebody had called the police department's paramilitary Tactical Support Team, who were coming ”to assist as they were now in a situation with an armed individual refusing to come out." The situation had escalated out of control.

* The 9-member TST arrived, making it 16 police officers at the house. You read that right. SIXTEEN POLICE OFFICERS.

Sixteen police carrying handguns and rifles outside. One terrified, paranoid middle-aged man with a mental illness inside.

* The TST proceeded to try and talk to Singer. They used a loud-hailer, sirens, and sent a TST officer to break down the front door with a hand-held battering ram..."to attempt to open the door so some communication could be established."

Eventually they decided to attach a stronger battering ram to their civilian armoured personnel carrier (with eight gunports), and use it to smash a hole in a wood panel covering the front window.

* A TST policeman was assigned to provide "lethal force coverage" for the vehicle.

"Announcements were made that they were the police and they were there to help."  Getting no response, they smashed through the front door. "... this was followed up with more sirens and more announcements over the loud hailer.

A neighbour watching the event described the "attempts to communicate" as banging and yelling

* Singer wasn't there. The team heard noises upstairs and a team was sent up some stairs.

"There were 10 to 15 stairs culminating in a 90-degree turn to the left followed by approximately five more stairs and a closed door at the top." or " The stairs went up approximately twelve steps up to a small landing where the stairs turned left and continued for another five to six steps, up to a closed door."

(Apparently the Forensic Identification Section investigator assigned to the shoddy investigation never counted exactly how many stairs, so 'just guessing' was the standard.)

* When they got to the door, Singer shot the fire extinguisher through a cat door (10x8 inches), forcing the tactical team to down the stairs and out the front door.

* Regrouping, the TST team went back up the stairs. In the lead, carrying a ballistic shield and his handgun, was the officer who provided "lethal force coverage" when the tactical officers smashed their way into Singer's home. Behind him was an officer armed with a rifle. And last was a policeman carrying "a less-than-lethal beanbag shotgun".

The two police armed to kill went first, the one with a non-lethal weapon was last.

Remember, Singer was in his own home, hurting no one, minding his own business, besieged by sixteen armed police who just smashed their way into his house, defending himself against a mob armed with handguns and rifles--- with a fire extinguisher.

* What happened next, is anyone's guess. You might think that's the job of the IIU, to investigate and determine what happened. But here's how the IIU reached its conclusion.

The two TST police who shot Singer immediately lawyered up. They couldn't be questioned, never mind cross-examined. They provided obviously polished statements of their version of what happened.

In effect, the IIU received second-hand accounts of the killing of Bradley Singer from people paid to defend the men who shot him.

* The first man up said in his statement that he opened the door to a room at the top of the stairs--- and was met with something right out of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre. 

“SO1 pushed the door open with the shield and stepped into the doorway. He immediately heard yelling coming from a dark room to his left located a few feet from the door. He then observed an axe charge at him and then repeatedly and violently ram and strike the left side of the shield in a piercing motion.

“SO1 retreated backwards taking a few steps down the staircase while AP continued advancing and switched to swinging and striking the shield with the axe. AP was now in the doorway overtop of SO1 and another TST member.

AP raised the axe in the air towards me and my teammates in a chopping motion. It all happened within seconds. In that moment, fearing for my life and fearing of grievous bodily harm or death to myself and my teammates, I discharged my pistol.”

* The rifle-wielding policeman behind him had this account:

“SO1 was slowly opening the door when AP appeared to use his body to slam the door shut. SO1 fell backwards causing SO2 to support him from behind to prevent him from falling. SO1 recovered and placed the ballistic shield against the cat door to prevent any further fire extinguisher discharge...

“SO1 started opening the door and SO2 saw a blur of motion and heard the impact of something heavy hitting the police shield and a male screaming and swearing at us. SO2 moved to SO1’s left and could see that AP was attacking SO1 with an axe. AP was swinging the axe down hard at the shield with both of his hands in a clear attempt to strike SO1.

“SO2 stated that AP was screaming and swearing at the officers with his face locked on to SO1. SO2 saw the axe handle hit the top of the shield with the blade of the axe entering the area between the shield and SO1’s head.

“According to SO2, at that time it was clear to him that SO1 was at risk of death or grievous bodily harm. SO2 leaned out to the left of 21 the shield and discharged between two to four rounds at AP’s centre of mass.”

* The officer with the bean-bag shotgun, who happened to be the patrol partner of the man with the rifle, played the perfect Sgt.Schultz of "I see nothing. NOTHING" fame. He told the IIU investigator:

“When they made it up the stairs, the door opened quickly and then slammed shut. The door opened again and the two officers in front of him fell back into WO7 and pinned him on the stairs. WO7 had no view of the door at this point as his view was totally obstructed by the two officers in front of him. As this was happening, WO7 heard someone yell "axe” and then he heard three to five gunshots.

* Another officer standing several steps below the first three said he "could see the three officers but not the door...WO7 then observed the door open and AP was standing there with an axe held above his head. Almost simultaneously, he heard a bunch of shots and someone transmitting on the radio that AP was down".

*The second-in-command of the Tactical team that day said:

"SO1 reached for the door handle and attempted to open the door. WO5 observed the door open and AP moving aggressively and quickly towards the officers. AP had a wooden object in his hands and appeared to be pushing it in a horizontal fashion towards the ballistic shield and officers. The three officers moved suddenly backwards into the wall of the staircase/landing. At the same moment, WO5 heard gunshots and observed SO2 discharge his gun.”

* The officer in command said:

“WO4 observed SO2 and WO7 (rifle and beanbag) moving suddenly backward on the landing and into the wall beside the stairs. WO4 thought the officers were possibly being pushed down the stairs. WO4 then observed SO2 bringing up his rifle and firing three or four times. Due to the angle of the stairs at the landing, WO4 could not see SO1 or AP from his vantage point.

******

Bradley Singer was shot at least six times. He suffered three rifle shots at point blank range to his upper abdomen. He had a gunshot to his upper right arm which caused a visible broken bone. The coroner said any one of these four shots could have killed him. Singer also had a gunshot to his upper left arm and his left forearm. A paramedic told of seeing two or three entrance wounds to the arm with the broken bone but one could have been an exit wound seen by another paramedic.

The exact number of shots fired could have been determined by examining how many bullets were missing from the handgun and the rifle. The Forensic investigator apparently didn't do that.

The second-hand accounts of the shooting provided to the IIU are not corroborated by officers in command that day, who saw pushing and not an axe attack, and those accounts are contradicted by two officers regarding the timing of the shots.

By choosing the accounts supplied in writing by the officers who fired the shots over those given in person by witnesses, the IIU exposed its inherent bias of selecting "evidence" that exonerates police who kill over evidence that disputes their stories.

We looked further into that premise. We discovered that the conclusions in the report were those of Acting Civilian Director Bruce Sychuk. Who? We asked the same question. We quickly learned he was a provincial prosecutor.

There's a saying that roughly goes this way: when you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail. To a prosecutor, defendants all look guilty and police witnesses are all saints. Is that what happened here? Is this the mind-set that defines the so-called Independent Investigation Unit?

Following the Singer killing then-acting police chief Art Stannard said there just wasn't time to call for a mental health professional to the scene.

But he was talking only about the isolated minutes immediately preceding the shooting.

Supt. Bonnie Emerson said at the time "Officers are human beings"

What was Bradley Singer? An animal to be hunted, chased, and captured or killed? For what? Failing to show up for a doctor's appointment?

There will be a mandatory inquest, but will the issue of police incitement of an incident be examined?  After J.J. Harper was killed by a policeman, there was a public inquiry.

If the officers are not charged with homicide to let a jury of civilians decide what defines "reasonable force", then the government must call a public inquiry for Bradley Singer.

But what about the license to kill?

Sychuk, in dismissing the matter of why Singer was killed, cited some law. There's a section of the Criminal Code that says police can use "as much force as necessary" to do their job "if he acts on reasonable grounds..." Sychuk then cited Section 25 (4) of the Criminal Code which reads

 (4) A peace officer, and every person lawfully assisting the peace officer, is justified in using force that is intended or is likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm to a person to be arrested...

But police weren't a Singer's house to arrest him. They had no arrest warrant. They had a Mental Health Order.

So Sychuk cited a section of the Manitoba Mental Health Act reading:

Protection from Liability

118 No action for damages or other proceeding lies or may be brought personally against the director... or any other person acting under the authority of, or engaged in the administration of this Act or the regulations for anything done ... in the performance or exercise, or the intended performance or exercise, of any duty or power under this Act or the regulations, or for any neglect or default in the performance or exercise, or intended performance or exercise in good faith of such a duty or power.

While the section specifies 'action for damages', such as paying for smashing in your door, that's a civil matter. But everyone knows that in law words matter, so we consulted a dictionary to determine the meaning of "other proceeding".

Here's what we found:

A legal proceeding is a formal process that involves invoking the power of a court to enforce the law. It can also refer to a step in a larger legal action.

Examples of legal proceedings:

A court hearing

A trial

An application to the court

An appeal of a court decision

A bankruptcy proceeding

A divorce proceeding

A criminal proceeding

In a nutshell, the Act says no action or proceeding may be brought against any person action under the authority of this Act for anything done under this Act or for any neglect or default in the performance of such a duty or power.

Where's Joe Biden with preemptive pardons when you need him?


Popular posts from this blog

The unreported bombshell conspiracy evidence in the Trudeau/SNC-Lavelin scandal

Wow. No, double-wow. A game-changing bombshell lies buried in the supplementary evidence provided to the House of Commons Judiciary Committee by former Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould. It has gone virtually unreported since she submitted the material almost a week ago. As far as we can find, only one journalist-- Andrew Coyne, columnist for the National Post--- has even mentioned it and even then he badly missed what it meant, burying it in paragraph 10 of a 14 paragraph story. The gist of the greatest political scandal in modern Canadian history is well-known by now. It's bigger than Adscam, the revelation 15 years ago that prominent members of the Liberal Party of Canada and the party itself funneled tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks into their own pockets from federal spending in Quebec sponsoring ads promoting Canadian unity. That was just venal politicians and a crooked political party helping themselves to public money. The Trudeau-Snc-Lavalin scandal is...

Crips and Bloodz true cultural anchors of Winnipeg's aboriginal gangs

(Bebo tribute page to Aaron Nabess on the right, his handgun-toting friend on the left) At least six murder victims in Winnipeg in the past year are linked to a network of thuglife, gangster rap-styled, mainly aboriginal street gangs calling themselves Crips and Bloods after the major black gangs of L.A. The Black Rod has been monitoring these gangs for several months ever since discovering memorial tributes to victim Josh Prince on numerous pages on Bebo.com, a social networking website like Myspace and Facebook. Josh Prince , a student of Kildonan East Collegiate, was stabbed to death the night of May 26 allegedly while breaking up a fight. His family said at the time he had once been associated with an unidentified gang, but had since broken away. But the devotion to Prince on sites like Watt Street Bloodz and Kingk Notorious Bloodz (King-K-BLOODZ4Life) shows that at the time of his death he was still accepted as one of their own. Our searches of Bebo have turned up another five ga...

Manitoba Hydro is on its deathbed. There, we said it.

Manitoba Hydro is on its deathbed. Oh, you won't find anyone official to say it. Yet . Like relatives trying to appear cheery and optimistic around a loved one that's been diagnosed with terminal cancer, the people in power are in the first stage of grief -- denial. The prognosis for Hydro was delivered three weeks ago at hearings before the Public Utilities Board where the utility was seeking punishingly higher rates for customers in Manitoba. It took us this long to read through the hundred-plus pages of transcript, to decipher the coded language of the witnesses, to interpret what they were getting at, and, finally, to understand the terrible conclusion.  We couldn't believe it, just as, we're sure, you can't--- so we did it all again, to get a second opinion, so to speak.  Hydro conceded to the PUB that it undertook a massive expansion program--- involving three (it was once four) new dams and two new major powerlines (one in the United States)---whi...

Nahanni Fontaine, the NDP's Christian-bashing, cop-smearing, other star candidate

As the vultures of the press circle over the wounded Liberal Party of Manitoba, one NDP star candidate must be laughing up her sleeve at how her extremist past has escaped the scrutiny of reporters and pundits. Parachuted into a safe NDP seat in Winnipeg's North End, she nonetheless feared a bruising campaign against a well-heeled Liberal opponent.  Ha ha.  Instead, the sleepy newspeeps have turned a blind eye to her years of vitriolic attacks on Christianity, white people, and police. * She's spent years  bashing Christianity  as the root cause of all the problems of native people in Canada. * She's called for  a boycott of white businesses . * And with her  Marxist research partner, she's  smeared city police as intransigent racists . Step up Nahanni Fontaine, running for election in St. John's riding as successor to the retiring Gord Macintosh. While her male counterpart in the NDP's galaxy of stars, Wab Kinew, has responded to the contro...

Exposing the CBC/WFP double-team smear of a hero cop

Published since 2006 on territory ceded, released, surrendered and yielded up in 1871 to Her Majesty the Queen and successors forever. Exposing the CBC/FP double-team smear of a hero cop Some of the shoddiest journalism in recent times appeared this long August weekend when the CBC and Winnipeg Free Press doubled teamed on a blatant smear of a veteran city police officer. In the latest example of narrative journalism these media outlets spun stories with total disregard for facts that contradicted the central message of the reports which, simplified, is: police are bad and the system is covering up. Let's start with the story on the taxpayer funded CBC by Sarah Petz that can be summed up in the lead. "A February incident where an off-duty Winnipeg officer allegedly knocked a suspect unconscious wasn't reported to the province's police watchdog, and one criminologist says it shows how flawed oversight of law enforcement can be." There you have it. A policeman, not ...

Winnipeg needs a new police chief - ASAP

When did the magic die? A week ago the Winnipeg police department delivered the bad news---crime in the city is out of control. The picture painted by the numbers (for 2018) was appalling. Robberies up ten percent in  a single year.  (And that was the good news.) Property crimes were up almost 20 percent.  Total crime was 33 percent higher than the five year average. The measure of violent crime in Winnipeg had soared to a rating of 161.  Only four years earlier it stood at 116. That's a 38 percent deterioration in safety. How did it happen? How, when in 2015 the police and Winnipeg's police board announced they had discovered the magic solution to crime? "Smart Policing" they called it.    A team of crime analysts would pore through data to spot crime hot-spots and as soon as they identified a trend (car thefts, muggings, liquor store robberies) they could call in police resources to descend on the problem a...