The Black Rod

The origin of the Usher of the Black Rod goes back to early fourteenth century England . Today, with no royal duties to perform, the Usher knocks on the doors of the House of Commons with the Black Rod at the start of Parliament to summon the members. The rod is a symbol for the authority of debate in the upper house. We of The Black Rod have adopted the symbol to knock some sense and the right questions into the heads of Legislators, pundits, and other opinion makers.

Name:
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

We are citizen journalists in Winnipeg. When not breaking exclusive stories, we analyze news coverage by the mainstream media and highlight bias, ignorance, incompetence, flawed logic, missed angles and, where warranted, good work. We serve as the only overall news monitors in the province of Manitoba. We do the same with politicians (who require even more monitoring.) EMAIL: black_rod_usher@yahoo.com

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Why does the CMHR need $2 million by May 30?


There's something fishy going on with the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, and we can't put our finger on what it is.

Let's start with the bogus "news" story in the Winnipeg Free Press, the propaganda arm of the CMHR, that Canadian realtors "have come up with a $2 million donation."

There's no byline so we don't know who wrote the story, but whoever it was,  he or she had to struggle mightily with the facts to devise a story that implies something false without lying outright.

Someone with only a cursory interest in the CMHR would read the story and come away thinking the Canadian Real Estate Association had raised $2 million and donated it to the still-unopened museum. 

That's what the Free Press wants you to think.

But reading a little closer you see that the realtors' fundraising campaign started in 2008. In truth, then, it took them six years to raise $2 million. And their donation is not new money. It's been on the books for years.  The FP wants you to believe Gail Asper just raised $2 million for the museum, when its not true.

Way back in the summer of 2012, the Friends of the CMHR newsletter carried this update:

"Individual REALTORS, brokerage firms, boards and associations across Canada have
joined forces to support the CMHR, contributing an impressive $1.69 million to the
FCMHR. The REALTORS campaign fundraising goal of $2 million is now within reach!"
The real story is that the 97,000 realtors and related groups raised only a pathetic $310,000 in the last two years.  That's a whopping $3.18 per person, or $1.59 each a year.  That penny-ante support is the true measure of public support for the CMHR.

So why would the Winnipeg Free Press trumpet a donation that's little more than pocket change?  

We've referred to Gail Asper as Winnipeg's biggest panhandler, but until now we didn't know how literal that description was.  Earlier this year, Gail Asper's  Friends of the CMHR was actually begging people for spare change in St.Vital Centre. 

Here's how they proudly described their panhandling efforts:

"In March, St. Vital Centre asked customers to demonstrate their support for the CMHR by turning their loose change into St. Vital Centre Giftcards using the centre’s coin counter machine. St. Vital Centre then matched the total amount and donated the proceeds from the campaign to Friends of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights. In total, they raised more than $10,000 for the Museum in just over one month!"

The CMHR has been reduced to competing with  bums for beer money.  Its obvious they're scrambling.  This year, for the fourth year in a row, the CMHR has failed to produce a financial report for the first quarter of the year (January to March), hiding its dire financial situation into the fall, at least.
The Friends of the CMHR have issued a desperate plea to Canada's Chinese community for $2 million by May 30, 2014.  This is the first time we've ever seen a request for money with a deadline attached.  What's the significance of May 30?

Is the phony claim that they've raised $2 million and the hope they can raise $2 million by June related to a loan application for which they have to prove they can make the payments?

Any financial institution dumb enough to loan the CMHR money should look at a calender. 

May 30 is one month before June 30, also known as the deadline to pay city taxes. 

The CMHR is already $4 million in arrears,  and, like you, has received its 2014 tax bill.  That should be for another $4 million to $5 million which they don't have.

At the end of last year, the CMHR received the last of the $145 million the federal government has paid into the project.  That means anything they've spent this year (2014) is paid by IOU's and whatever pennies they can pick up.

It's May 24, or what's known in our office as three months to come up with an excuse why they can't open the museum on time -- again.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

In the Olympics of Guilt and Recrimination, we have a winner



The 2014 Winter Olympics have ended and Canadians are still on a high.

We trounced the Americans in hockey (always a good thing) and our women's curling team set an Olympic record that can never be beaten (all wins, no losses).

All in all, we're betting Canadians will say they got their money's worth at these Olys. How much money?  The federal government kicks in $22 million a year towards winter sports. (Another $34 million goes to summer sports and $6 million to team sports.)

Canada sent 221 athetes to Sochi: 27 speed skaters, 25 men’s hockey players, 24 snowboarders, 21 women’s hockey players, 20 freestyle ski jumpers, 17 figure skaters, 16 bobsledders, 15 alpine skiers, 13 cross-country skiers, 10 curlers, eight lugers, eight biathletes, seven ski jumpers, six ski cross competitors and four skeleton racers.

They did us proud, each and every one of them, and that includes the coaches and parents of the athletes.

But while rooting through the numbers, we were struck by a sad fact.

The federal government is spending $22 million a year to support athletes and coaches
who leave us bursting with pride, win or lose, at their dedication and sportsmanship.  At the same time they are spending nearly the same amount, $21.7 million, on the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, whose only goal is to make Canadians hate themselves, to blames themselves for historical wrongs, to promote ideas that divide the people, to feel as bad as possible about their ancestors and their political leaders.

That's when we stumbled across another shocking fact.  Public support for the CMHR is almost non-existent, if you measure it by financial contributions.

Ever since chief promoter Gail Asper launched a smear campaign against all ethnic groups that oppose giving primacy to the Holocaust at the "rights" museum, financial donations have plummeted.

The fundraising arm of the CMHR, Friends of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, headed by Gail Asper, announced that it had raised $4 million in 2013.  That's less than the amount the museum owes for city taxes (and isn't paying).

But what was striking is that the total amount raised came from ONLY THREE DONATIONS. 

Yep. You read right.  The "Friends" had to go hat in hand to rich people, some of whom had already signed cheques, for more money. Hardly anyone dug into their pockets.

* They got $2.5 million more from Michael and Amira Dan, of Ontario, who had already pledged $1 million.
* And they got $1 million from Alice and Grant Burton, also of Ontario. 
* The remaining $1.5 million came from the Manitoba Teachers Society, which overrode opposition within its ranks to give money to the museum.

The Friends of CMHR say they got donations from another 200 people in 2013, but the money raised from the little people was so paltry they don't even count it in their total.

The largest non-millionaire contribution was $68,000 from two auctions of guitars signed by famous people. But those people were buying guitars, not giving money to the CMHR, probably in the hope their purchases would go up in price because of the autographs. 

Even then, the Friends of CMHR couldn't be honest about the guitar money. Their news release said they raised $101,000 from the sales of guitars -- which was true only if you add the $32,000 raised in 2011.

You can already smell the desperation from the CMHR. In public statements, their spokesmen have backed away---far, far away---from initial claims that the Canadian Museum for Human Rights would attract a quarter of a million additional tourists to Winnipeg each year.  Now they deftly speak only about a report they were given (don't blame us it it's wrong) that claims 250,000 people will visit the museum (they're here anyway, so if they've seen the zoo already, why not the ugly museum).

And they're trying to hype the white elephant through "exclusive" peeks at the museum interior for various news agencies.  The latest was Global News, which got the skinny on the 11 levels of choking propaganda that will greet attendees.

Like:

2. Indigenous Perspectives
Aboriginal concepts of humanity and our responsibilities to each other are explored in one of the most dramatic spaces of the museum. The focus is a circular theatre of curved wooden slats representing the multitude of Canadian aboriginal traditions, which will play a 360-degree film and serve as a space for storytelling, performance and discussion. (2,700 square feet plus outdoor terrace)
 
 

So you will get to sit in a giant basket and watch a movie, half of which is projected behind your head. Pure genius. Or you can go on the terrace for a smoke (hey, you got rights).

Maybe you will stop at:
3. Canadian Journeys
Canada’s Journey will contain 18 “story niches,” most of them eight-by-eight-foot “boxes.”
 
You can explore the 1919 Winnipeg General Strike.  We're betting they skipped the admiration of the strike leaders for the Communist Revolution in Russia in 1917. And how if they got their way, we would all be enjoying the same rights that citizens of countries controlled by the Communists enjoyed for 50 years.

Oh, and there's the perennial favorite, the Chinese Head Tax. Do you think they'll mention how Canada fought a war with Japan to free China from military dictatorship? We repaid that head tax a thousand times over. 

Of course Japanese Canadian Forced Relocation gets a box. Will the Canadians captured at Hong Kong and tortured by the Japanese for four years get a mention here?
 
Where would you rather see your tax dollars go? 
Athletes?  Or sackcloth and ashes? 


Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

The St. James Firehall stonewall crumbles under the facts


Drop dead, said the City to Colin Craig.

Oh, not so succinctly. But the message was clear---beat it, get lost, scram.
It took less than a dozen words to slam the door in Craig's face, lock it, bolt it, and hope he went away.
Craig, you see, is the local director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. And more than a year ago, he politely asked the City for briefing notes, memos, emails and any other documentation they had regarding the process by which Winnipeg's new Fire Hall No. 11 ballooned in size to it's present corpulent state.

Not that it's gargantuan in the way the Canadian Museum for Human Rights is -- four football fields of empty space enclosed within a steel and concrete skeleton. But it is almost half again as big as the other three firehalls built as part of the same infrastructure replacement program.

And Fire Hall No. 11 is the fishiest project of the entire Sheegl-Shindico Bid-Rigging Scandal that's consumed the public's trust in City Hall. Built without a contract, millions of dollars over budget, so big that nobody knew what to do with the extra space, it piqued the interest of the Taxpayers Federation. Hence the freedom of information request.

The city replied: "In this case the records you have requested do not exist."

That, in a word, is preposterous.

If the documentation is there, then Colin Craig is being stonewalled by a city administration that's hiding something far bigger than anybody has imagined so far.

If the documentation is not there, that means somebody has swept the records clean, wiped his fingerprints off and skipped,
confident that the city administrators will make no efforts to recover what they don't want anybody to see, anyway.

Didn't we say it's time to call in the cops?

We scoured the Ernst-and-Young audit of the firehalls fiasco, as well as our clippings file, for clues to what the City of Winnipeg administrators are hiding.

We uncovered the exact time period that should be flooded with the  documentation the Taxpayers Federation is looking for.
 

Why the city administration claims they can't find a thing becomes very, very suspicious.

*  In 2009 the Winnipeg Fire Department got the okay to build four new fire stations.  They went looking for a suitable design.

They found one in London, Ontario, and in January 2010 they signed a contract to use the design. But already there was distinction between the three firehalls they intended to build in Winnipeg suburbs and the one station going up in St. James.

*  The City issued a tender for fire stations based on the Ontario design. It was amended in March, 2010:
B2.1 The Request for Proposals (RFP) contained herein documents the City of Winnipeg’s (City) invitation to organizations (Bidders) to present Proposals in accordance with the requirements identified in this RFP for the development of up to four (4) newly developed Fire Paramedic Stations (“the Project” or “WFPS Station”) for the Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Service (WFPS).

Specifically, the City is requesting submissions from private sector firms, individually or in consortium, for:
(a) construction (inclusive of site work) Sections A and B; and/or
(b) design, and construction (inclusive of site work) Section C;
of up to four (4) 750-930 square metre (8,000-10,000 square foot) facilities for the purpose of providing fire and paramedic service operations.
 
“SECTION A.
One Suburban Fire Paramedic Station in the Vicinity of 5000 Roblin Boulevard
SECTION B.
Two Suburban Fire Paramedic Stations
- one in the vicinity of Grant Avenue and Waverley Street; and
- one in the vicinity of Bishop Grandin Boulevard and Lagimodiere Boulevard
SECTION C.
One Core Fire Paramedic Station in the vicinity of Portage Avenue and Berry Street

As the auditors noted:
"Within less than a month of issuing the...RFP, the City issued amendments ... that called for the construction of 3 suburban stations based on the M&M design and the design and construction of an urban station Portage – Station #11."

In short, the suburban stations would be built on the Ontario design while Fire Station #11 would be designed separately.

*  June, 2010.  Only Shindico bid on the tender, and their bid was way too high.  Shindico said that the Ontario design could not be built on the Winnipeg budget, but that they had a design of their own that could. 

Regarding Fire Station #11, here's how the auditors reported Shindico's position:
"With respect to the core or urban station... the response from Shindico stated:
“To replace the firehall located at Portage Avenue and Berry Street, Shindico’s proposing the new Fire Paramedic Station be incorporated into the green space located immediately adjacent to the west side of the southbound lane of Route 90 on the north side of Portage Avenue. The property is owned by the City of Winnipeg. .......The Cost to develop the Core Station on Portage Avenue is
$5,991,500 or $518.11 per square foot ....The Core Station is more complex than the Suburban Stations” Based on this statement the design for the Core station, as proposed by Shindico, was to be 11,564 square ft ."
 
The size of the St. James firehall was already growing.  The auditors note that this was before the city saw any design incorporating a hazmat unit (or fire museum). 

* The auditors continued to document the decisions regarding Station No. 11:
 
June 28, 2010
Material Management and WFPS decide to move forward with Shindico regarding development of their concepts for Portage Station # 11. (MC#17) Suburban stations are expected to be subject to public tender.

September 2, 2010
... Shindico notifies Chief WFPS, via email, that they are working on an alternative station design for suburban stations, based on a request from the City. Email notes Shindico’s belief that M&M design can’t be done for City’s budget . Chief WFPS cautions regarding this approach, but gives go ahead regarding
Station #11. Email exchange is forwarded to CAO by Shindico.
 
September 3, 2010
The Current Chief WFPS responded to (Shindico) indicating: I am only able to legally negotiate on the specification that was put out to all the bidders. That specification is the Murphy and Murphy specification for the 3 suburban fire paramedic stations. To do anything else at this time puts the city in a position of serious risk from the other bidders.
Station 11 is a different animal as it had not (sic) accompanying design and falls under its own category of negotiation. That is certainly open to further discussion.
I would suggest Bob that before your company expends a lot of time and energy designing a new building, we resolve some of these issues first.
Lets go full steam ahead on the 11 Station project though. I will meet with materials management on Tuesday to begin phase 2 of that process and let you know the result.
 
*  Here's where the St. James firehall story gains traction. This story appeared in The Metro, one of Canstar's weeklies:
 
Talk of new fire hall location heating up
Fire department eyeing spot near Route 90 for Berry St. replacement, deputy chief says

By: Matt Preprost  Posted: 03/23/2011 3:34 AM   March 23, 2011
Fire official are eyeing a two-acre plot of land at Portage Avenue and Century Street for the relocation of Station No. 11 on Berry Street.
 
The Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Service is hoping to build a new fire and paramedic station and fire museum inside the cloverleaf just west of Century Street, Reid Douglas, the services deputy chief, confirmed in an interview.
 
The plan is not yet finalized, and needs to go through several civic committees and public consultation before being approved, Douglas said.
snip

If all goes to plan, a new $4 million, 12,000 sq. ft. station will be built in the northwest corner of the cloverleaf next to the St. James Hotel.
 
It's March, 2011.  This is the first time there's any talk about a fire museum.  And note the size of the station---12,000 sq. ft.  That's probably a rounding-up of the 11,564 sq. ft. of Shindico's station design. 

But this time round it's more than just the cost of the "core station"; it includes a museum.  Was that always the intent? Surely there must be some documentation explaining if it was.

*  In June, 2011, the city hired Williams Engineering to track the progress of the firehalls project.
 
July 7, 2011
 “Meeting of Progress Minutes” # 2 indicated that by July 7, 2011 the design to Portage - Station #11 was 90% complete.
 
October 14, 2011
William’s MPM of this date indicates that the cost estimate for Portage - Station#11 is $5.1 Million. 

Oct. 19, 2011   The City issues a foundation permit for Station #11.

January 27, 2012
The construction of Portage Station was awarded
based on two contracts. One contract for the foundation and one for the completion of the building. The commencement of the construction of Portage Station # 11 with a foundation only contract, effectively bound the City to the construction of a station with the size and resulting cost that was not within the approved Council approved budget.
 
February 6, 2012
 A meeting was held between Legal Services, the MRE, the Current Chief WFPS and the WFPS Project Coordinator. During the meeting the following was discussed:
► The builder, Pre-Con was going bankrupt and needed payment for the Taylor property.
► There was an understanding that the proposed land exchange transferred excess value to Shindico. Such excess value was to be dealt with via a price reduction on Portage Station #11.
 
February 23, 2012
William’s issued a(n) MPM which included a new cost estimate from Shindico for Portage - Station #11, at $5.7 million before signage and permits.
 
*  April 26, 2012
The Current COO and CFO approved the foundation only contract for Portage -Station #11.
 
July 7,  2012
 
The Metro
Fire hall changes irk residents
By: Matt Preprost    07/18/2012 1:02 AM

Recent changes to the site plan of the new Station No. 11 fire hall in St. James has left a ringing in the ears of nearby residents.
Last week, city fire chief Reid Douglas and Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Service project manager Christine Friesen appeared before the Assiniboia community committee seeking approval to move the location of the station from the back end of the property near Century Street up to the front of the site near Portage Avenue.
The committee approved the changes following a two-hour public hearing, a move city officials say will increase visibility of the station, improve traffic sight lines and reduce the overall footprint of the station by about 600 square feet.

At the beginning of the hearing, a lawyer for the Viscount Gort Hotel argued the station’s construction was "unlawful" and it is being built without provincial approval.

Richard Good said Viscount owner Phillip Kives was not consulted, and the hotel could suffer a loss of revenue and reputation as a result of the decision.

The city proceeded with undue haste, Good said, calling for construction to be stopped until there was further consultation.

Coun. Scott Fielding (St. James-Brooklands) noted the WFPS held a public consultation about the station at the Viscount Gort in July 2011.

He also noted a letter sent by the hotel to the community about the hearing misled residents into believing the station was expanding in size and taking up more greenspace inside the cloverleaf when the opposite was true.
 
*  Fielding was 100 percent wrong. The station WAS expanding in size. He's since claimed somebody lied to him.  He's not named that "somebody."
 
*  The following month, August, 2012, the entire firehalls fiasco started to unravel.
CBC reporter Sean Kavanagh stumbled across Shindico floating a lease on the old St. James firehall, which was still owned by the city. That led to the revelation of a land swap with Shindico which had never been approved by city councillors and the fact that one firehall was now built on land the city did not own -- land owned by Shindico.
 
August 30, 2012
A meeting was held in the Current CAO’s office, where apparently the MMM informed the Current Chief WFPS that the WFPS were building the Portage Avenue station without proper award authorities in place.
 
The auditors elsewhere clarified that bafflegab in their report:

"It is unclear as to the point in time that the CAO (Phil Sheegl), COO (Deepak Joshi) and Legal Services were aware that Portage - Station #11 was being constructed without a contract and/or appropriate contract award authorities in place. MM, the CAO (Phil Sheegl), CFO and COO (Deepak Joshi)  were aware a contract was not in place by the end of August 2012 based on the content of the following email from the MMM:
 
For everyone’s sake and peace of mind, we need to determine the approvals that are in place, or not, for these Fire Stations.
This topic was briefly discussed at the CAO’s office today, but it is clear that the City is well underway building at least one $6 million dollar station with approval for only <$1 million."
 
*  To sum up, the budget was blown.  The city administration had the bright idea of spending the little bit that was left to dig the foundation for Fire Station No. 11, and to ask City Council for more money to finish the project the following year ( 2013).  In the meantime, Shindico would continue construction with the promise it would get paid.

The auditors observed:
 
► In respect to Portage - Station #11 contracting, we have been informed by both Williams and Legal Services that one of the reasons the contract was split into two components, the foundation and the remainder of the building, was because sufficient Council approved funding was not available to allow for an
award for the full value of construction costs. This would be against City Policy.

But note this odd -- and unexplained -- reference the following month:

September 19, 2012 
Corporate Finance sent email to CFO indicating:

Mike, here is an updated draft of the report. This considers the information provided in the spreadsheet and the information provided by Reid by way of email and meeting earlier today. It is a moving target - from what Reid is now saying, the budget for the three suburban stations construction was too low - he references $2 to $2.4 million in his email, based on the St. Thomas experience. Assuming he budgeted $2.2 million for these stations, the overall budget of $15.34 million works. This would also be supported by the fact at the same time, the City had received responses back from Shindico on 200-2009B that the buildings could be delivered for $275 per square foot ($6.1 million total). As the stations actually came in at, on average, $3.1 million each, that puts the budget $2.8 million shor
t.
 
...-what were the redesign efforts on 11 that took place to save $1.2 million?

* Here's where the trail of the change order for Station No. 11 gets hazy, in large part because there was no contract for its construction so nobody really knew what Shindico was building -- except Shindico.

Then-Fire Chief Reid Douglas told the auditors that the original design with the museum was rejected by Public Works as a traffic distraction.  When was that? Is there no documentation, especially since Douglas went on to state: 

Chief WFPS’s Comments Regarding Review of Ernst & Young Draft Report Dated September 5, 2013
"It was assumed the sq. ft. of museum elimination would translate to a 4th bay.  This requires additional accomodation in crew space as well thus increasing overall 3000 sf for apparatus bay and living space"

Here, definitely, is discussion of increasing the size of Fire Station No. 11.  This would require a change order.  Where are the emails, the memos, the documentation surrounding this discussion?
 
The auditors then complicated the story with this comment:

► The sizing of Portage - Station #11 did change significantly as a result of WFPS eliminating the museum component and adding space for the Hazmat unit. The original RFP specified a station of approximately 10,000 sq. ft. To meet the specification requested in the original RFP, Shindico’s response included a
station design that was 11,564 sq. ft. The final design for Portage - Station #11 was 14,459 sq. ft
.
 
Here is the first reference to a firehall that's 14,459 sq. ft. large. It's gone through two design changes, and city officials say there's no paperwork anywhere that discusses how and when the final size was reached.
 
And the mention of a Hazmat unit is new.  Once the museum was kiboshed, they obviously didn't know what to do with the space. So they began running with various ideas.  First was moving the Hazmat unit from St. Boniface into Station #11.
 
No way, declared United Fire Fighters of Winnipeg president Alex Forrest.

That idea was junked.  But the firehall was being built 3000 square feet bigger and something had to fill all that extra space.
 
By early October, 2012, we learned it would be the Hazmat unit from the Maples.
 
And one other thing got tossed along with the St. Boniface Hazmat--- the Fire Chief.  Reid Douglas was out of a job.
 
No sooner was his departure announced, than COO Deepak Joshi jumped to blame him for the debacle.
 
Chief thought bigger station would cost same
By: Bartley Kives    Posted: 10/26/2012 1:00 AM

FIRE Paramedic Chief Reid Douglas had the authority to supersize the new Station No. 11 because he believed he could add 33 per cent more space to the Portage Avenue structure without going over budget.



Winnipeg chief operations officer Deepak Joshi said Douglas had the authority to go ahead with the change because the chief believed the extra work could be done without exceeding his budget.

"He felt it was the right thing to do at the time," said Joshi, explaining the new station was still being designed after its concrete foundation was poured. There was no reason for the chief to believe his change order would result in such a cost increase, based on the information at his disposal, he added.
 
Joshi believed in October, 2012, that there was a change order. 
 
Today he says there's no record anywhere

We repeat, preposterous.
 
The city administration can start looking between March, 2011, when the Fire Chief said the new St. James station would be 12,000 square feet and July, 2011, when Williams Engineering reported that the design for the station was 90 percent complete. 

Somewhere there they'll find internal documentation discussing the scrapping of a museum, what to do with the extra space, the need for another 3000 square feet if a hazardous materials unit is to be shoehorned into the building.
 
The declaration that they can't find a single note, email, or document must be seen as part of the internal cover-up.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, January 20, 2014

City Hall Flipfloppers


Winnipeg Mayor Sam Katz says there's no need for an audit of the latest city mega-million-dollar boondoggle---the project to convert the downtown post office into a new police headquarters.

Everything you need to know about the reason for the huge cost overruns was explained in a report to his executive policy committee in December, he says.

Russ Wyatt, chairman of city council's finance committee, says there's no need for an audit of the latest city mega-million-dollar boondoggle. It's too expensive, he says, and for what? It will only say exactly what the audit of the project to build four new firehalls said---that the city's chief administrative officer (since departed) was incompetent.

Councillor Brian Mayes, a member of EPC, says there's no need for an audit of the latest city mega-million-dollar boondoggle because it's much ado about nothing.  "What we're really looking at here is 12 or 13 percent overrun ... most of it being financed through debt," he sniffed.


And yet last week Mayes was among the first of the councillors who voted against a police HQ audit to flipflop
and announce he was now supporting it. 

A day later Katz said, whaddya know, all of EPC except one member (unnamed) had agreed to support an audit -
just to get the public off their backs.

That means there are now enough votes to pass a motion for such an audit, a total reversal for Katz and his supporters who stood shoulder-to-shoulder at the last council meeting to denounce those councillors who argued in favour.

But when the biggest promoters of the audit, Councillors Paula Havixbeck and Jenny Gerbasi, were each asked on radio for the two top questions they wanted answered, they put the audience to sleep with a barrage of  mumbo jumbo.

The public does not want to know how the price of doorknobs and fire-rated cable resulted in cost overruns. 

The public does not want to know if former CAO Phil Sheegl was more incompetent on the police headquarters project than he was on the firehalls project. 

The public may want to know ...
how Brian Mayes can be so ignorant as not to understand the original budget of $135 million was blown by $75 million, which is NOT 13 percent, but it won't get the answer from an audit.

The big question is who misled city council at virtually every step of the police headquarters project. And why the mayor and his cabal have been covering up for them so furiously.

The deception started early.

In November, 2009, council was informed that the cost of redeveloping the old post office, including the cost to buy the land and buildings, would be an estimated $136.5 million. 

But, despite having eight consultants (including Shindico)  do due diligence on the purchase, not one of them realized, or wrote, that the purchase price could NOT be offset by the sale of the Public Safety Building. The land it sits on was donated to the city with the understanding it would always be used for civic purposes.

And, the cost presented to council did NOT include furniture, fixtures and equipment (known as FF&E), which would add another $22.1 million to the bottom line.

The administration then launched a  process that lasted the better part of a year which consisted of false starts and u-turns and culminated in, you guessed it, a sole-sourced contract by Phil Sheegl.  Sound familiar?

* They advertised for a project coordinator. Then cancelled the search.
* They advertised for a construction manager and accepted a joint bid from two companies, one of which walked away.
* They then hired a project manager to oversee the work of the construction manager.  The new guy? He sat on the board of the Winnipeg Blue Bombers with Phil Sheegl and came highly recommended -- by Phil Sheegl, who gave him a sole-sourced contract worth a quarter of a million dollars.
* The search for a construction manager included a reduction in the amount that a winning bidder would have to put up as a bond. The change was authorized by Phil Sheegl.

"The city, in consultation with various surety companies and at the urging of the Surety Association of Canada, determined that lowering the bonding requirements on the headquarters project could provide a broader base of potential bidders and potentially provide savings on the project cost," declared a report submitted to council.

"Bulls**t. That's absolute hooey," said Steven Ness, president of The Surety Association of Canada, to the Winnipeg Free Press. "No one from this organization ever encouraged any such action by the City of Winnipeg at all. It begs the question of who is saying we did."

The Construction Manager and consultant engineer "often disagreed which created a difficult situation for the Public Service to manage." states the latest report provided to city councillors.  The audit should detail what these disagreements were about.

While these shenanigans were underway, the city hired the engineering firm AECOM Canada to do the design work on the police headquarters.

A year earlier, council's intrastructure-renewal head, Coun. Mike O'Shaughnessy, openly questioned why the city was doing business with AECOM after a city report blamed the company for $12 million of cost overruns on the West End Water Pollution Control Centre because of "design errors, incomplete design and design clarification".  The city was forced to redraw part of the plans for the plant.

Wouldn't you know it ... AECOM's completed design was so full of design errors that the city had to redraw the plans for the post office reno. 

And that wasn't the worst of it.

After the first batch of cost overruns were brought to council's attention, Sheegl was tasked with negotiating a "guaranteed maximum price" on the police HQ.  He got one and brought it to city hall.

The problem turned out that it was neither "guaranteed" or "maximum". There were so many "except ifs" built into the GMP that council was essentially agreeing to a blank cheque.

The audit will be asked who, besides Sheegl, knew the GMP was a fraud.

The Sheegl defenders are shifting the blame to AECOM, saying that the GMP was based on a design that was only 30 percent complete.  But that salient fact was kept from councillors.  Why?

Councillors have been informed that Sheegl and his successor as CAO, Deepak Joshi, provided comments on the GMP draft.  The public should know what they said, because Joshi sure won't tell them.

He's not only refusing to give councillors answers about the police HQ project, he's tried to intimidate Coun. Havixbeck into stopping her probing.
And the mayor and his supporters have actively helped this cover-up.

At the last council meeting, Havixbeck tried to get an answer to the question of project oversight.

"THIS PROJECT HAS GONE FROM 135 MILLION TO OVER 200 MILLION AND COUNTING.

WHEN WE SAW THE RESULTS OF THE FIREHALL AUDIT WE SAW THAT THERE WAS NO PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE. I HAVE BEEN ASSURED THAT THERE WAS A STEERING COMMITTEE, HOWEVER, THIS REQUESTING IS FOR THE DATES THAT THE COMMITTEE MET, WHO WAS AT THE MEETING AND MINUTES FOR THE MEETING.

I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT THE ADMINISTRATION TELLS ME THEY WOULD NOT OR COULD NOT PROVIDE SOME OR ALL OF THAT INFORMATION, AND I WAS TOLD I WOULD NEED TO BRING IT FORWARD AS A MOTION, WHICH I HAVE.

EPC SEEMS SATISFIED THAT THERE IS NO NEED TO KNOW THAT INFORMATION, EVEN THOUGH, IN LIGHT OF A FIREHALL AUDIT THAT SAID THERE WAS NO PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE ON A MAJOR PROJECT, THIS ONE IS EVEN BIGGER. "
 
Her motion was defeated.  The conspiracy of silence won't have the same clout with the auditors.
 
Coun. John Orlikow made this astonishing revelation when debating the motion for an audit into the police headquarters fiasco:
 
The auditors into the firehalls scandal were giving councillors a closed-door look at their report. 

They had interviewed the city's top administrators and collected some usable information, but 90 percent of their information came after those interviews and only when they got a chance to go through the emails exchanged over the projects.
 

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, January 05, 2014

CMHR finances are dimmer than ever despite Toronto puffery


Bwahahahaha.
The snow's up to our roofs, it's colder in Winnipeg than on Mars, and the mayor thinks that clearing the snow and ice off city streets is an unnecessary luxury.  Sometimes you really need a laugh.

The Globe and Mail came to the rescue Saturday. In a puff piece about the over-budget, overdue, over-hyped Canadian Museum for Human Rights, writer Roy MacGregor gushed that "(m)ore than 75,000 people"  have donated money to build the thing.

"It is a striking and memorable building, if rather eccentric."

Which is Toronto-high society-speak for "Yikes, is it ever ugly!"

The punchline of the piece is how wrong MacGregor's awe-inducing declaration of public support for the epic money pit is.

By all accounts, the real number of donors to the CMHR is barely 7500.  That's right, one-tenth of what MacGregor said it was. Seven thousand, five hundred. And, to quote MacGregor "some as little as a few dollars."

So the family of multi-millionaires really are cheap panhandlers. 

They're bumming a couple of bucks here and a few bucks there to build a monument to their billionaire father while claiming its a sign that the public supports their conceit.  
The Globe and Mail scribe saw the real number, couldn't believe it wasn't a typo and added a zero to make it more "realistic". 

That's the only explanation, other than the usual journalistic incompetence.

Apart from the fake news promoted by the Globe and Mail, there is real news from the CMHR courtesy of museum CEO and chief cheerleader Stu Murray.

He was interviewed on CJOB a couple of weeks ago and dropped a bombshell that was overlooked by all the "professional" reporters in town.

Guest host Richard Cloutier was tossing Murray some softball questions about the cost of the museum ("$351 million. Period. Full stop.") when he asked what the $21.7 million in annual operating costs would cover.

"That pays for (cough) salaries...it pays for operations, lighting, umm, it pays for our PILT, which is Payment in Lieu of Taxes...So it pays for all the elements...to heat...everything that is involved in running an institution or a building.
" said Murray.

Boom.

For the first time ever, officials of the CMHR have said that the operating funding it gets from the federal government will pay for utilities and taxes. 


As late as 2011 they were saying they needed to "augment operating funds to cover PILT".  Prior to that they said they had forgotten to include utilities and taxes in the money they needed each year and would the federal government please cough up more cash to pay those bills.

Obviously the feds have said that the $45 million bailout they gave the museum in 2011 was all the extra money they would get. This is a game changer.  Two months ago we wrote that fundraising for the CMHR had collapsed.

Now it appears the prognosis is even worse.

Ever since Gail Asper, chief fundraiser for the Friends of the CMHR, launched her hate campaign against Canada's Ukrainian community in 2011, fundraising has fallen off a cliff. They claim they raised $4 million in 2013, but since much of that is in installments, they're actually pulling in a fraction of that each year. 

All the government money has been spent as of the end of December, and they've just started installing the exhibits. The only money to pay for that is what the Friends can raise from outstanding IOUs and new money. 

We thought the Friends would be responsible for covering the tax bill, but it looks like the museum itself will pay out of operating funds. That means the Friends will still have to backstop the museum as well. The museum already owes more than $4 million in back taxes (your tax bill could drop by 1 percent if they paid up) and will owe $8 million or more next June.  If this was a privately owned building it would already be up for tax sale.

It gets even worse when the CMHR has to start paying back the $45 million advance it got. Starting in 2018 they will have six years to pay off the advance out of operating funds. Say that's $8 million a year (advance plus interest), on top of $4 million, or $5 million or $6 million a year for taxes and utilities and half the annual operating funds are committed.

They'll have to sell an awful lot of t-shirts to make up the difference.

Stu Murray was less than convincing that the museum could do it.

He was asked to address the skepticism about the museum -- "that two...five years from now you'll be back on CJOB doing a fundraiser..."

Well, he said, the museum has spaces to rent out, programming over and above the regular admissions, and "additional events to create additional revenue."  Hazy, enough?
Murray said the rights museum won't undercut the admission price of other art galleries and museums in the city. 

The Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature charges $8 for adults and $6.60 for students and seniors for one venue, $21 and $17 respectively for admission to the museum, science centre and Planetarium.

They would need 500,000 single adult admissions to pay off their tax bill each year.

He added: "If you would give us the opportunity to walk through the doors and you don't like what you see, I'll refund your money."

Maybe he didn't realize what he was saying, but Murray actually undermined his own boosterism.

"You can go to any city in the world for a convention and have a great convention centre; we're going to have a spectacular convention centre but the hook is you can't do something around human rights like you can do it in Winnipeg. And that's going to be a great, great angle for us."

"...If you just built a square box and said I hope that people will come and see this because of the subject matter, they wouldn't come. They're gonna come because ... I have taken personally about 3500 people, since I've been on the job, through that building ... the wow factor is palpable. I mean people feel it. In order to bring people to Winnipeg to talk about an educational value around human rights the first thing that has to happen was the right decision -- build an iconic building."

Get it? He knows people wouldn't cross the street to see a museum about human rights, so what $351 million really bought was a fancy building.

Winnipeg is going to get a new convention centre ( 8 blocks away) "and we're the anchor", he said.

So far the CMHR is the anchor around the neck of taxpayers.

P.S. For those who were taught that the plural of roof is rooves---that's now considered archaic.


And for the record, wind chills of -51C like those we had all last week equate to 60 below zero on the Fahrenheit scale.  Why don't weathermen say so.

Labels: , , , , , ,