Skip to main content

Embedded in the Parliamentary Press Army

If you made a list of the most improbable news stories, this would certainly be near the top.

Stephen Harper's speeches are the most downloaded podcast on iTunes Canada, Apple's popular music download site.

When we saw it on Global National, we didn't believe it either. But, it's true.

And it shows how Harper is managing to outplay, outwit and outlast the Parliamentary Press Gallery which has launched a campaign to undermine his government.

Two embedded reporters with the Parliament Press Army filed stories yesterday that only showed how desperate the media have become in their War on Harper.

Take Alexander Panetta, from Canadian Press, and his "scoop" which ran under various headlines across the country, mostly on the theme "Military opposed media ban" (Winnipeg Free Press) or "Military pans ceremony ban" (Winnipeg Sun).

If you just read the headlines, you would think he had uncovered some evidence that the Canadian military was upset at Stephen Harper for banning the press from covering the return to Canada of the bodies of soldiers killed in Afghanistan.

You would be wrong, of course. But facts are not necessary when you're engaged in a war for the hearts and minds of the public.

Read the lead in Panetta's story:
"Senior military officials opposed the Conservative government's controversial ban on media coverage of homecoming ceremonies for soldiers killed in Afghanistan, documents obtained under the Access to Information Act suggest."

He admits he's making the story up, but hopes you don't notice it because you're distracted by the official-sounding "documents obtained under the Access to Information Act".

These "documents" only "suggest" his story. In other words, he reads into them what he wants you to believe.

A real story would immediately follow with the names of these "senior military officials." Panetta coughs up "a Department of National Defence official".
One official. Singular.

This official took pictures of reporters standing by a highway as they, themselves, tried to take pictures of the coffins being unloaded from planes.

"This may cause safety issues and generate even more frustration, particulary in winter," Lt. Col. Richard Lavoie, a departmental public-affairs director, wrote in an e-mail in which he forwarded the photos to several colleagues.

Did Lt. Col.Lavoie take the pictures? About 20 were shown to Chief of Defence Rick Hillier, says Panetta. But either he's written the story so poorly that we can't connect Lavoie to the official with the camera, or Lavoie had nothing to do with taking the pictures and Panetta is hoping we make a connection that isn't there.

Regardless, the documents fail to show the military upset at the banning of the press.

It shows one officer concerned about safety as police cars blocked a lane of highway so the television cameras could try to capture pictures of the tarmac. It sounds like he's worried a distracted semi driver will wipe out some CBC trucks. Now wouldn't that be some bad publicity?

Oh, but "military officials found other ways to express their displeasure; they cleared equipment from the airport tarmac so the news media outside the base could have an unobstructed view of the ceremony," says Panetta, based on his psychic ability to read the minds of unnamed military officals.

No, wait, says Panetta. I got proof.

"...reporters who attended the event did not require public documents as evidence that military officials were peeved by the government order," he wrote.

Good thing, since there obviously aren't any such public documents to be found in the story.

"One journalist said the military made it obvious by their words and actions that day."
"The military men wanted us there," said one journalist assigned to cover the event.
"They were (greeting us) like, 'We're glad you came'."

Ah ha.

One unnamed journalist (you don't think his name was Alexander Panetta, do you) in a deerstalker hat, no doubt, uses his powers of deduction to see what he wants to see.

Take one military P.R. officer, a few photos, add a reporter with no name and voila, a perfectly good anti-Harper story for Canadian Press.

Those Parliamentary Press Gallery guys really know how to ask the tough questions of themselves.

Not to be outdone, Winnipeg Free Press National Reporter Paul Samyn launched his own assault on Harper Hill.

Samyn's target---the "Harper government's Universal Child Care Benefit".

According to Ken Battle, president of Caledon Institute of Social Policy, the Conservatives are mean bastards who have consciously designed their program to screw welfare families and give money to the rich who can afford to have one parent stay home while the other rakes in the big bucks.

Samyn even has a diagram prepared by the Manitoba government to show that a single parent with $20,000 in income will benefit less than a two-parent family where (presumably) daddy makes $100,000 and mommy stays home with their child.

About $1.73 a month less.

Which would be easily covered by Deadbeat Dad if we knew where he was, but that's another question hard-hitting reporter Samyn didn't get into.

What Samyn also didn't get into is who Ken Battle is.

You see, it seems we've met him before. Way back in January, Free Press columnist Frances Russell wrote about Ken Battle and the Caledon Institute and how the Conservatives' child care plan is just another scheme to make the poor poorer and the rich richer (by $1.73 cents a month according to Samyn).

Russell, just like Samyn, forgot to mention one very important fact about Ken Battle.

To quote ourselves:
Battle used to be the senior policy adviser to the Minister of Human Resources Development, Doug Young and his successor Pierre Pettigrew. He was instrumental in creating the National Child Benefit for the Liberal Party, a program he cites as "the most important innovation in Canadian social policy since medicare."

"I wrote the basic document making the case for the National Child Benefit," he brags on the Web.

He proudly outlines how he stickhandled the plan into law, including:
- "a one-on-one discussion of my paper with then-Finance Minister Paul Martin",
- a presentation to a Cabinet committee on social development along with Minister Pettigrew, and
- "helping HRDC officials make the case for a sufficient down payment on the NCB in the 1997 budget which announced the reform."

"I wrote the first draft of the 1997 budget document proposing the National Child Benefit."

In other words, the chief critic of the Tory child care plan is the author of a Liberal child care plan which he thinks is much better.

No bias there. Move along.

It seems that while Stephen Harper is No. 1 with a bullet in the new media, the MSM reporters are either shooting blanks or shooting themselves in the foot in the old.

Popular posts from this blog

The unreported bombshell conspiracy evidence in the Trudeau/SNC-Lavelin scandal

Wow. No, double-wow. A game-changing bombshell lies buried in the supplementary evidence provided to the House of Commons Judiciary Committee by former Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould. It has gone virtually unreported since she submitted the material almost a week ago. As far as we can find, only one journalist-- Andrew Coyne, columnist for the National Post--- has even mentioned it and even then he badly missed what it meant, burying it in paragraph 10 of a 14 paragraph story. The gist of the greatest political scandal in modern Canadian history is well-known by now. It's bigger than Adscam, the revelation 15 years ago that prominent members of the Liberal Party of Canada and the party itself funneled tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks into their own pockets from federal spending in Quebec sponsoring ads promoting Canadian unity. That was just venal politicians and a crooked political party helping themselves to public money. The Trudeau-Snc-Lavalin scandal is

Crips and Bloodz true cultural anchors of Winnipeg's aboriginal gangs

(Bebo tribute page to Aaron Nabess on the right, his handgun-toting friend on the left) At least six murder victims in Winnipeg in the past year are linked to a network of thuglife, gangster rap-styled, mainly aboriginal street gangs calling themselves Crips and Bloods after the major black gangs of L.A. The Black Rod has been monitoring these gangs for several months ever since discovering memorial tributes to victim Josh Prince on numerous pages on, a social networking website like Myspace and Facebook. Josh Prince , a student of Kildonan East Collegiate, was stabbed to death the night of May 26 allegedly while breaking up a fight. His family said at the time he had once been associated with an unidentified gang, but had since broken away. But the devotion to Prince on sites like Watt Street Bloodz and Kingk Notorious Bloodz (King-K-BLOODZ4Life) shows that at the time of his death he was still accepted as one of their own. Our searches of Bebo have turned up another five ga

Manitoba Hydro is on its deathbed. There, we said it.

Manitoba Hydro is on its deathbed. Oh, you won't find anyone official to say it. Yet . Like relatives trying to appear cheery and optimistic around a loved one that's been diagnosed with terminal cancer, the people in power are in the first stage of grief -- denial. The prognosis for Hydro was delivered three weeks ago at hearings before the Public Utilities Board where the utility was seeking punishingly higher rates for customers in Manitoba. It took us this long to read through the hundred-plus pages of transcript, to decipher the coded language of the witnesses, to interpret what they were getting at, and, finally, to understand the terrible conclusion.  We couldn't believe it, just as, we're sure, you can't--- so we did it all again, to get a second opinion, so to speak.  Hydro conceded to the PUB that it undertook a massive expansion program--- involving three (it was once four) new dams and two new major powerlines (one in the United States)---whi

Nahanni Fontaine, the NDP's Christian-bashing, cop-smearing, other star candidate

As the vultures of the press circle over the wounded Liberal Party of Manitoba, one NDP star candidate must be laughing up her sleeve at how her extremist past has escaped the scrutiny of reporters and pundits. Parachuted into a safe NDP seat in Winnipeg's North End, she nonetheless feared a bruising campaign against a well-heeled Liberal opponent.  Ha ha.  Instead, the sleepy newspeeps have turned a blind eye to her years of vitriolic attacks on Christianity, white people, and police. * She's spent years  bashing Christianity  as the root cause of all the problems of native people in Canada. * She's called for  a boycott of white businesses . * And with her  Marxist research partner, she's  smeared city police as intransigent racists . Step up Nahanni Fontaine, running for election in St. John's riding as successor to the retiring Gord Macintosh. While her male counterpart in the NDP's galaxy of stars, Wab Kinew, has responded to the controversy over

Exposing the CBC/WFP double-team smear of a hero cop

Published since 2006 on territory ceded, released, surrendered and yielded up in 1871 to Her Majesty the Queen and successors forever. Exposing the CBC/FP double-team smear of a hero cop Some of the shoddiest journalism in recent times appeared this long August weekend when the CBC and Winnipeg Free Press doubled teamed on a blatant smear of a veteran city police officer. In the latest example of narrative journalism these media outlets spun stories with total disregard for facts that contradicted the central message of the reports which, simplified, is: police are bad and the system is covering up. Let's start with the story on the taxpayer funded CBC by Sarah Petz that can be summed up in the lead. "A February incident where an off-duty Winnipeg officer allegedly knocked a suspect unconscious wasn't reported to the province's police watchdog, and one criminologist says it shows how flawed oversight of law enforcement can be." There you have it. A policeman, not

Winnipeg needs a new police chief - ASAP

When did the magic die? A week ago the Winnipeg police department delivered the bad news---crime in the city is out of control. The picture painted by the numbers (for 2018) was appalling. Robberies up ten percent in  a single year.  (And that was the good news.) Property crimes were up almost 20 percent.  Total crime was 33 percent higher than the five year average. The measure of violent crime in Winnipeg had soared to a rating of 161.  Only four years earlier it stood at 116. That's a 38 percent deterioration in safety. How did it happen? How, when in 2015 the police and Winnipeg's police board announced they had discovered the magic solution to crime? "Smart Policing" they called it.    A team of crime analysts would pore through data to spot crime hot-spots and as soon as they identified a trend (car thefts, muggings, liquor store robberies) they could call in police resources to descend on the problem and nip it. The police