Skip to main content

Tories didn't need dirty tricks to deliver a message

Somebody play the theme from Deliverance.

The Liberals got caught with their pants down and they're squealing like pigs.

What kind of crazy world is this when the federal Conservatives launch attack ads, then admit they did it?Amateurs.

It's not like the good old days when the Liberals could launch a smear against Stephen Harper without leaving any fingerprints, then watch it unfold as "news."

Oh, what fun that was.

It was mid-December, 2005, in the midst of the last federal election campaign, when a Canadian Press reporter travelling with Conservative leader Stephen Harper was approached by -- how did they describe him -- "an opponent of his social policies."

It was the day before the first leaders debate on T.V. and just after the Liberal communications director had said parents getting monthly child care payments would just spend it on beer and popcorn.

Psst, said the tipster. (Okay, we made that up for dramatic effect - ed.)

The "opponent of (Harper's) social policies" told the Canadian Press reporter that a friend of his had been surfing the Internet when he stumbled upon a speech made by Harper to an American think tank. It was shocking and the Canadian public needed to know. He would direct CP to the speech on one condition---he wouldn't be identified.

The reporter passed the tip to CP's election desk in Ottawa. They spoke with the tipster who said he was a concerned citizen without any political affiliation. They ran the story.

1997 Harper speech resurfaces mid-campaign
Canadian Press
December 14, 2005

OTTAWA - An eight-year-old Stephen Harper speech, which praises American conservative values, disparages Canada as a "welfare state'' and says the jobless aren't worried because they have generous benefits, could provide fresh ammunition to his critics.
The speech was delivered to a 1997 Montreal meeting of the Council for National Policy, a little-known right-wing American think tank.

CBC's Ottawa reporter Keith Boag quoted from the speech on the National that night. CTV gave the story some context on its website.

1997 Harper speech resurfaces mid-campaign
Updated Wed. Dec. 14 2005 11:34 PM ET News Staff
Just in time to give his political foes ammunition to use during Thursday's leaders debate in Vancouver, an eight-year-old speech has resurfaced, threatening to trip up Conservative Leader Stephen Harper.

The Liberals professed themselves surprised at the "news" but wasted no time jumping on the CP "scoop."
As CP eventually reported:
The story was immediately leapt upon by the Liberal war room as evidence the Conservative leader is outside mainstream Canadian opinion.
By the following day, the Liberals were sending out backgrounders under the following Editor's Note: "A CP story yesterday highlighted a speech given by the Honourable Stephen Harper to the Council on National Policy.'' But then, in their arrogance, the Liberals slipped up.

CP learned from one of their reporters, Alexander Panetta (who was in town to cover the debate) that the tipster was in Vancouver working with Paul Martin's team preparing to tackle the other party leaders. They contacted Mr. Tipster with a follow-up question.

Was the Liberal Party behind his tipping the news agency about the speech?
Uuuhhh, he said.
The jig was up.

CP ran a story detailing how thery got suckered by Alex Munter, a well-known gay activist from Ottawa (where Panetta, who reported on the gay marriage debate, would have known him well).

Anonymous tip on old speech leads back to Liberals
Bruce Cheadle Canadian Press, December 18, 2005
WA (CP) An eight-year-old Stephen Harper speech dug up by Liberal researchers cracks a rare window into campaign war-room strategy, media manipulation and the ethical quicksand that sometimes underlies an election leak.
This is a tale that reflects well on no one.
In its simplest terms, the Liberals used a third party to put a buffer between them and a story that was unflattering to the Conservative leader.

Now that's how to put out a smear.
Use a cut-out.
Feign shock and anger.
You don't just buy an ad.

In fact, if the Liberals have their way, you can't just buy an ad like the ones the Conservatives want to run Super Bowl weekend.

It turns out that one of their stalwart financial contributers is James Patterson, the man behind Telecaster, the private agency that screens TV ads.

Canadian television stations let Telecaster tell them what's safe to air.

Swearing is a no-no. So too, apparently, were Conservative ads during the last election campaign which showed Liberal MPs admitting their own attack ads against Stephen Harper had gone too far. Telecaster canned them before their aired.

The Liberals may have thought that the Conservatives could never get attack ads past their boy. And maybe they're right. But the news media have repeated the Dion ads a thousand times, giving the Conservatives a million dollars of free ad time.

The ads were a pre-emptive strike. They gave the Conservatives the initiative in Day One of Question Period. They were Topic #1 on Mike Duffy's first show after his heart surgery. They were the top of the fold on every major newspaper.

Did they work?

We'll let Canwest columnist Greg Weston have the last word:
"...Harper's strategists apparently believe they can kill two political issues with one set of attack ads, portraying the Liberals as eco-delinquents and Dion as an ineffective leader who got nothing done as environment minister... Like everyone, Dion only gets one chance to make a first impression with voters, and the Conservatives seem only too happy to introduce Dr. Did Little."

Ouch. That hurts. No wonder the Liberals are squealing.

Popular posts from this blog

The unreported bombshell conspiracy evidence in the Trudeau/SNC-Lavelin scandal

Wow. No, double-wow. A game-changing bombshell lies buried in the supplementary evidence provided to the House of Commons Judiciary Committee by former Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould. It has gone virtually unreported since she submitted the material almost a week ago. As far as we can find, only one journalist-- Andrew Coyne, columnist for the National Post--- has even mentioned it and even then he badly missed what it meant, burying it in paragraph 10 of a 14 paragraph story. The gist of the greatest political scandal in modern Canadian history is well-known by now. It's bigger than Adscam, the revelation 15 years ago that prominent members of the Liberal Party of Canada and the party itself funneled tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks into their own pockets from federal spending in Quebec sponsoring ads promoting Canadian unity. That was just venal politicians and a crooked political party helping themselves to public money. The Trudeau-Snc-Lavalin scandal is

Crips and Bloodz true cultural anchors of Winnipeg's aboriginal gangs

(Bebo tribute page to Aaron Nabess on the right, his handgun-toting friend on the left) At least six murder victims in Winnipeg in the past year are linked to a network of thuglife, gangster rap-styled, mainly aboriginal street gangs calling themselves Crips and Bloods after the major black gangs of L.A. The Black Rod has been monitoring these gangs for several months ever since discovering memorial tributes to victim Josh Prince on numerous pages on, a social networking website like Myspace and Facebook. Josh Prince , a student of Kildonan East Collegiate, was stabbed to death the night of May 26 allegedly while breaking up a fight. His family said at the time he had once been associated with an unidentified gang, but had since broken away. But the devotion to Prince on sites like Watt Street Bloodz and Kingk Notorious Bloodz (King-K-BLOODZ4Life) shows that at the time of his death he was still accepted as one of their own. Our searches of Bebo have turned up another five ga

Manitoba Hydro is on its deathbed. There, we said it.

Manitoba Hydro is on its deathbed. Oh, you won't find anyone official to say it. Yet . Like relatives trying to appear cheery and optimistic around a loved one that's been diagnosed with terminal cancer, the people in power are in the first stage of grief -- denial. The prognosis for Hydro was delivered three weeks ago at hearings before the Public Utilities Board where the utility was seeking punishingly higher rates for customers in Manitoba. It took us this long to read through the hundred-plus pages of transcript, to decipher the coded language of the witnesses, to interpret what they were getting at, and, finally, to understand the terrible conclusion.  We couldn't believe it, just as, we're sure, you can't--- so we did it all again, to get a second opinion, so to speak.  Hydro conceded to the PUB that it undertook a massive expansion program--- involving three (it was once four) new dams and two new major powerlines (one in the United States)---whi

Nahanni Fontaine, the NDP's Christian-bashing, cop-smearing, other star candidate

As the vultures of the press circle over the wounded Liberal Party of Manitoba, one NDP star candidate must be laughing up her sleeve at how her extremist past has escaped the scrutiny of reporters and pundits. Parachuted into a safe NDP seat in Winnipeg's North End, she nonetheless feared a bruising campaign against a well-heeled Liberal opponent.  Ha ha.  Instead, the sleepy newspeeps have turned a blind eye to her years of vitriolic attacks on Christianity, white people, and police. * She's spent years  bashing Christianity  as the root cause of all the problems of native people in Canada. * She's called for  a boycott of white businesses . * And with her  Marxist research partner, she's  smeared city police as intransigent racists . Step up Nahanni Fontaine, running for election in St. John's riding as successor to the retiring Gord Macintosh. While her male counterpart in the NDP's galaxy of stars, Wab Kinew, has responded to the controversy over

Exposing the CBC/WFP double-team smear of a hero cop

Published since 2006 on territory ceded, released, surrendered and yielded up in 1871 to Her Majesty the Queen and successors forever. Exposing the CBC/FP double-team smear of a hero cop Some of the shoddiest journalism in recent times appeared this long August weekend when the CBC and Winnipeg Free Press doubled teamed on a blatant smear of a veteran city police officer. In the latest example of narrative journalism these media outlets spun stories with total disregard for facts that contradicted the central message of the reports which, simplified, is: police are bad and the system is covering up. Let's start with the story on the taxpayer funded CBC by Sarah Petz that can be summed up in the lead. "A February incident where an off-duty Winnipeg officer allegedly knocked a suspect unconscious wasn't reported to the province's police watchdog, and one criminologist says it shows how flawed oversight of law enforcement can be." There you have it. A policeman, not

Winnipeg needs a new police chief - ASAP

When did the magic die? A week ago the Winnipeg police department delivered the bad news---crime in the city is out of control. The picture painted by the numbers (for 2018) was appalling. Robberies up ten percent in  a single year.  (And that was the good news.) Property crimes were up almost 20 percent.  Total crime was 33 percent higher than the five year average. The measure of violent crime in Winnipeg had soared to a rating of 161.  Only four years earlier it stood at 116. That's a 38 percent deterioration in safety. How did it happen? How, when in 2015 the police and Winnipeg's police board announced they had discovered the magic solution to crime? "Smart Policing" they called it.    A team of crime analysts would pore through data to spot crime hot-spots and as soon as they identified a trend (car thefts, muggings, liquor store robberies) they could call in police resources to descend on the problem and nip it. The police