Skip to main content

Bellringer fails to bridge Selinger's credibility gap

You don't need a bloodhound to tell you that something stinks at the Legislature.

And that awful smell is coming straight from the office of Greg Selinger, Minister of Finance.

Greg Selinger is beginning to look like a Laddie Macbeth walking the halls and trying to get the stain of Crocus off his hands.

We now know why the NDP government has been fighting harder than the Russians at Stalingrad against any idea of a judicial inquiry the Crocus scandal. Orange jumpsuits may be party colours but they are so unappealing.

The Selinger Memo, a leaked cabinet document, has proved that the NDP knew in November, 2000, that Crocus was a shaky investment that was about to become a pyramid scheme. Was the Attorney General, Huff 'n Puff Gord Macintosh, in the cabinet room when this document was circulated? Wasn't he sworn to protect people from this sort of thing?

It's obvious now why the NDP propped up the Crocus Fund so aggressively. They changed laws (the cooling-off period), tweaked regulations (how to fudge the 10% limit for a single investment), and turned a blind eye to rule-bending where necessary (annual selling limits).

When the Conservatives raised questions about the valuations of Crocus investments in 2002, Crocus sent its goon squad to make them shut up. The NDP laughed themselves sick. But they knew the critiques were valid---and did nothing.

The fortuitous disclosure of the Selinger Memo can be compared in scandal-speak to the revelation of the Nixon tapes.

Carol Bellringer's eleventh-hour discovery of the cabinet memo in the Auditor General's Crocus files is not in the same league as Mary Jane Woods' erasure of 18 minutes of prime conspiracy chat; but the effect is identical. It raises more questions than it answers.
  • Why does former auditor general Jon Singleton not remember such a bombshell?
  • Did he even see the memo? Or was it intercepted by some staffer who then "summarized" it for Singleton?
  • How could such a huge red flag not be cited in the final report when Singleton criticized the government for missing so many red flags?
  • Why wasn't it the very first item in any timeline in the report?
  • Is this the only cabinet document provided to the Auditor General?
  • Were there restrictions on citing or referring to cabinet documents?
  • Was this the only time the problems with the Crocus Fund were discussed in cabinet in the four years between 2000 and 2004 when Crocus went into receivership?
Any student of government scandals knows the principal lesson is that it's not the crime that gets you convicted, it's the cover-up.

Selinger and Premier Gary Doer were in full cover-up mode yesterday, sticking closely to the party line: it's old news, everyone knew, we didn't do anything anyway, and it's Gary Filmon's fault. Oh, and the Conservatives will sell Hydro.

But Selinger decided something more was needed.

So he lied.

"It's very clear in the document we did say in the Legislature - the Minister of Industry said - everybody was aware of the liquidity - the potential liquidity problem. And by the way, the liquidity problem never came to pass."

Say what?

The "liquidity problem" is an obvious reference to the many warnings contained in Selinger's own memo to cabinet.

Let us quote just a few:
· Crocus recently requested two very significant changes that would allow it to raise more money from Manitobans and induce investors to keep their money invested for a longer period of time. These changes are thought by Crocus to be necessary to deal with a potential liquidity problem that could arise over the next few years.
· The possibility of liquidity problems is very real, but the two requested changes may only push the problems further into the future when they could be even larger.
· In effect, Crocus is requesting the ability to use money from new investors to payoff earlier investors who want to redeem, rather than using profits earned on the investment portfolio.

Maybe Selinger was banking that none of the reporters had read the Auditor's Report on Crocus.

Or at least that none of them remembered this section:

4.3.3 Liquidity, Cash Flow, and the Solidarity Transaction

You know, that part where Singleton discussed the liquidity problem which arrived in 2003, larger than ever, just as predicted.

Where the Crocus Fund borrowed $10 million from the Quebec Solidarity Fund and disguised the loan as an "investment" to mislead Manitobans.

Here's a small sampling of how Singleton explained the liquidity problem:

The Liquidity Situation that Prompted the Solidarity Transaction

· In order to prevent a shortfall in its minimum reserve requirements, the Fund negotiated a short term institutional investment of $10 million from the Fonds de Solidarite (Solidarity), a Quebec-based LSIF.
· In early July 2002, the former Chair of CIF approached Solidarity to indicate that CIF would be interested in negotiating the terms of a short-term investment by Solidarity to CIF.

As part of the request, the former CEO commented that 'we presently face a short term liquidity challenge'...

The former CEO (Sherman Kreiner) further noted that there had been extensive discussions at the Executive and Personnel Committee and the Board regarding CIF's liquidity challenges and that they were committed to addressing this problem as their highest priority.

The Auditor General's report said that in December, 2002, "prior to the 2003 RRSP selling season", the former CEO (Sherman Kreiner) and former CIO (James Umlah) of Crocus made misleading public statements about the loan, implying that the financial strength of Crocus was attracting institional investors.

"The Fund misled investors in a significant way by failing to properly disclose and publicly communicate the essence of the Solidarity transaction... The 'spin' provided by the press releases and the comments made by the former CEO and former CIO to shareholders regarding the investment from Solidarity helped to conceal the liquidity challenges confronting the Fund."

You know, the liquidity challenges "that never came to pass", according to Greg Selinger.

As a result of the disguised loan:

· The audited September 30, 2003 financial statements significantly misrepresented the fundamental characteristics of the investment from Solidarity
· The transaction was misrepresented in the prospectuses
· This also means that MER was understated. (In other words, the management expense ration, the fee charged to investors to run the fund, was larger than Crocus said it was.)

The NDP had been warned that Crocus was running short on money two years earlier.
They recognized the scam Crocus was pulling on potential investors and-- did nothing.

As we said, Selinger must have counted on the fact he could say anything at all and the mainstream media would simply parrot his words without examining the facts.

A particularly galling case in point is CBC Manitoba.
They posted this Wednesday morning:

Letter proves Crocus document wasn't withheld: minister
Last Updated: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 8:54 AM CT
CBC News

Manitoba Finance Minister Greg Selinger says the opposition parties have it wrong and he has proof that the former auditor general did have access to a controversial cabinet document during his review of the collapsed Crocus Fund.



The leaked cabinet document, written by Selinger in 2000, discusses changes Crocus wanted to make in the face of looming "liquidity problems" and raises concerns about the fund's ability to pay investors who wanted to redeem their shares over the next few years.

Selinger insists his government's actions in 2000 - he refused to allow Crocus to make the changes it sought - saved taxpayers millions in potential losses through the fund.

For the record, the Selinger Memo says the Crocus Fund wanted two things: changes to the annual selling limit and to the "cooling-off" period for Labour-Sponsored Investment Funds ( http://blackrod.blogspot.com/2007/02/call-grissom-crocus-bullet-matched-to.html ).

The NDP turned a blind eye to the Crocus Fund's breach of the annual selling limit in the 2001 RRSP season and the government scrapped the cooling-off period in the summer of 2001.

The CBC got it 100 percent wrong.

Popular posts from this blog

Manitoba Hydro is on its deathbed. There, we said it.

Manitoba Hydro is on its deathbed.
Oh, you won't find anyone official to say it. Yet.
Like relatives trying to appear cheery and optimistic around a loved one that's been diagnosed with terminal cancer, the people in power are in the first stage of grief -- denial.
The prognosis for Hydro was delivered three weeks ago at hearings before the Public Utilities Board where the utility was seeking punishingly higher rates for customers in Manitoba.
It took us this long to read through the hundred-plus pages of transcript, to decipher the coded language of the witnesses, to interpret what they were getting at, and, finally, to understand the terrible conclusion.  We couldn't believe it, just as, we're sure, you can't--- so we did it all again, to get a second opinion, so to speak. 
Hydro conceded to the PUB that it undertook a massive expansion program--- involving three (it was once four) new dams and two new major powerlines (one in the United States)---which it could not a…

The unreported bombshell conspiracy evidence in the Trudeau/SNC-Lavelin scandal

Wow.
No, double-wow.
A game-changing bombshell lies buried in the supplementary evidence provided to the House of Commons Judiciary Committee by former Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould.
It has gone virtually unreported since she submitted the material almost a week ago. As far as we can find, only one journalist-- Andrew Coyne, columnist for the National Post--- has even mentioned it and even then he badly missed what it meant, burying it in paragraph 10 of a 14 paragraph story.
The gist of the greatest political scandal in modern Canadian history is well-known by now. It's bigger than Adscam, the revelation 15 years ago that prominent members of the Liberal Party of Canada and the party itself funneled tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks into their own pockets from federal spending in Quebec sponsoring ads promoting Canadian unity. That was just venal politicians and a crooked political party helping themselves to public money.
The Trudeau-Snc-Lavalin scandal is so much more…

Nahanni Fontaine, the NDP's Christian-bashing, cop-smearing, other star candidate

As the vultures of the press circle over the wounded Liberal Party of Manitoba, one NDP star candidate must be laughing up her sleeve at how her extremist past has escaped the scrutiny of reporters and pundits.
Parachuted into a safe NDP seat in Winnipeg's North End, she nonetheless feared a bruising campaign against a well-heeled Liberal opponent.  Ha ha.  Instead, the sleepy newspeeps have turned a blind eye to her years of vitriolic attacks on Christianity, white people, and police.
* She's spent years bashing Christianity as the root cause of all the problems of native people in Canada.
* She's called for a boycott of white businesses.
* And with her  Marxist research partner, she's smeared city police as intransigent racists.
Step up Nahanni Fontaine,
running for election in St. John's riding as successor to the retiring Gord Macintosh.
While her male counterpart in the NDP's galaxy of stars, Wab Kinew, has responded to the controversy over his woman-and-gay bas…

Crips and Bloodz true cultural anchors of Winnipeg's aboriginal gangs

(Bebo tribute page to Aaron Nabess on the right, his handgun-toting friend on the left) At least six murder victims in Winnipeg in the past year are linked to a network of thuglife, gangster rap-styled, mainly aboriginal street gangs calling themselves Crips and Bloods after the major black gangs of L.A.
The Black Rod has been monitoring these gangs for several months ever since discovering memorial tributes to victim Josh Prince on numerous pages on Bebo.com, a social networking website like Myspace and Facebook.

Josh Prince, a student of Kildonan East Collegiate, was stabbed to death the night of May 26 allegedly while breaking up a fight. His family said at the time he had once been associated with an unidentified gang, but had since broken away.

But the devotion to Prince on sites like Watt Street Bloodz and Kingk Notorious Bloodz (King-K-BLOODZ4Life) shows that at the time of his death he was still accepted as one of their own.

Our searches of Bebo have turned up another five gang-li…

Sex and Drugs in the Peg. Is that what PM Justin Trudeau is covering up?

The Parliamentary Press Gallery spent the weekend yukking it up with Justin Trudeau at the annual gallery dinner, demonstrating that relations between the Prime Minister and the press were back to normal, the master and his voice in sync again. Things had been a little strained a few weeks ago when Trudeau, determined to show that he was a tough guy and not to be trifled with in the House of Commons, delivered a hard elbow to a female MP's breast while manhandling an Opposition MP who wasn't moving fast enough to suit the PM.
The reporters and pundits had to do quite the soft shoe to excuse Trudeau's boorishness when video of the incident contradicted his initial explanation for how his elbow smashed into her chest.  Luckily, the controversy subsided quickly and the press gallery could go back to work--- adoring the Sun King.
And then, last week, damn it, up popped another matter that threatened to blemish the reign of Trudeau II. Its name---Hunter Tootoo.
Hunter Tootoo turned…

It's time to call the family to pay their last respects. Manitoba Hydro is done.

A perfect storm is hitting Manitoba Hydro. Insolvency is inevitable. 

Eight months ago we reported that Hydro was on its deathbed, based on the testimony of the utility's own witnesses at a hearing of the Manitoba Public Utilities Board.

http://blackrod.blogspot.ca/2017/08/manitoba-hydro-is-on-its-deathbed-there.html
Since then the patient's condition has deteriorated rapidly. It's time to call the family to pay their last respects. 

Last week the Bank of Canada announced that the years of low interest rates are officially over. The Bank raised the bank rate by one quarter of one percent. It was the third rate hike within a year.  It's just the start.

The Bank of Canada expects at least one and possibly two more rate hikes in 2018.  That will bring the bank rate to about half of where the Bank wants it to be.  You read that right---half.  The Bank of Canada wants the bank rate to steady out at 2.5 percent, the lower end of a range the Bank feels is right for a healthy econo…