The Black Rod

The origin of the Usher of the Black Rod goes back to early fourteenth century England . Today, with no royal duties to perform, the Usher knocks on the doors of the House of Commons with the Black Rod at the start of Parliament to summon the members. The rod is a symbol for the authority of debate in the upper house. We of The Black Rod have since 2005, adopted the symbol to knock some sense and the right questions into the heads of Legislators, pundits, and other opinion makers.

Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

We are citizen journalists in Winnipeg. When not breaking exclusive stories, we analyze news coverage by the mainstream media and highlight bias, ignorance, incompetence, flawed logic, missed angles and, where warranted, good work. We serve as the only overall news monitors in the province of Manitoba. We do the same with politicians (who require even more monitoring.) EMAIL:

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Gail Asper to Ukrainians: Shut up.

Gail Asper has told Canada's Ukrainian community to shut up and accept their second-class status in the Canadian Museum of Human Rights.

In a hissy column in the Ottawa Citizen on Tuesday, Asper dropped the mask of reason and went for the jugular of Lubomyr Luciuk, director of research for the Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association.

"Instead of creating a divisive climate, I would urge Luciuk to give the Canadian Museum for Human Rights' dedicated board, management and staff an opportunity to work on and present at the appropriate time the museum's content in its full form."

Translation into people-speak: shut yer yap, and let the big kids do their job.

Luciuk has driven Gail Asper and her colleagues at the CMHR into a tizzy with his demand, echoed by other Ukrainian associations, that the Holodomor, the deliberate starvation of millions of Ukrainians on Stalin's orders, be given equal status in the museum to the Holocaust, which saw millions of Jews systematically killed on Hitler's orders.

The Asper-controlled CMHR plans a prominent and permanent Holocaust gallery, with all the other mass murders in the world relegated to the back of the bus in a grabbag Atrocity Gallery, one of 12 "zones" within the museum.

That, said Gail, is because the Holocaust is so s-s-s-s-s-s-special.

" Canada is one of the few western countries that does not study the Holocaust in its national institutions. Luciuk asserts that everyone is fully aware of the Holocaust, so it doesn't need to be prominent. The board disagrees..."

It's "an essential part of the world's human rights history (according to virtually every respected human rights expert)", she wrote.

The killing of millions of kulaks with unpronounceable Slavic names in tiny godforsaken villages on the orders of a Communist dictator, obviously, is not.

And she threw Ukrainians a bone.

"Although this museum is not a museum of genocide filled with one depressing gallery after another, there is a permanent gallery in which mass atrocities will be studied and it has always been the intent to include the Ukrainian famine clearly and permanently."

Her clear message: There's us, the Jews, and there's youse, the rest of the world. See?

Gail Asper, presumably speaking for the rest of the board of the CMHR, thus answered Luciuk's demand that the content committee report be scrapped and the museum's displays be reconsidered.

In his Dec. 20, 2010, Ottawa Citizen column, Luciuk proposed that "Ottawa should reject calls for more funding of this boondoggle from the public purse" until "management and curators... craft a truly inclusive and fair-minded national museum."

That sent a chill down Gail Asper's spine, given the desperate financial straights the museum is in currently. That plus Luciuk's history lesson on how the Asper family managed to get their holocaust museum plan funded:

"Given Canwest's continued influence, Stephen Harper's team came through with funding, attaching the Asper project to the public teat, permanently. It has been sucking generously ever since."

Gail tried rebutting the charge by rewriting history.

"While Luciuk may feel the museum is "sucking generously" on the "public teat" of the federal government, in fact less than one-third of the $310-million capital cost for this project will come from Ottawa, despite the fact this museum is a federal Crown corporation."

Unfortunately for her, the true story was related in The Black Rod two years ago.

On April 17th, 2003, Izzy Asper announced the "potential creation" of a $270 million Canadian Museum for Human Rights.
"The Asper Foundation has proposed a unique partnership for funding the capital cost of the museum, estimated at $200 million for the first phase." he said.
The original proposal, prepared in 2001, called for $100 million from the federal government, $20 million from the province, $20 million from the city of Winnipeg, and $60 million from the private sector.

The original proposal was for the construction of the CMHR with the following stages to encompass an endowment fund to finance a grandiose scheme to bring tens of thousands of school children to Winnipeg each year to tour the museum.

So of Izzy's plan, the federal government would cough up half the money and the private sector about 30 percent. Even then, it turns out, Izzy had no guarantee the feds would buy in. Manitoba's top Liberal MP, Reg Alcock, had a different story for the CBC.
"Chrétien had promised to donate further money, said Treasury Board Minister Reg Alcock, but it wasn't going to be $100 million, a figure he says the Asper Foundation named on its own.
"There's no evidence of that," Alcock said. "Because they decided they wanted that [and] we had to deliver it is just wrong."

Asper also conveniently forgot that the federal government has pledged to provide $21 million a year in operating costs.

And that the board of the CMHR wants another $5 million to $9 million to cover taxes.

And Gail has asked the feds for millions more to make up the shortfall of at least $25 million that the private sector was supposed to pay but she can't raise.

Sucking at the public teat, indeed.

The CMHR's intransigent position on ranking genocides isn't helped when their supporters spill the beans. Liberal MP Anita Neville simply gushed about the CMHR during a not-so-distant session of Parliament, and Gail Asper may wish she had been more circumspect:

In the House of Commons – December 8, 2009
National Holocaust Monument Act
Bill C-442, An Act to establish a National Holocaust Monument
Hon. Anita Neville (Winnipeg South Centre, Lib.):
We heard a member opposite speak of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights in Winnipeg, which is an important initiative in this country. The original capital funding of $100 million promised by the previous Liberal government is fully supported by the current government, which I applaud, as is the ongoing operating funding making it a national museum.
However, the important issue is that the genesis of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights in Winnipeg was that it would be a Holocaust museum. There was much discussion over it and much input from a whole host of communities as to whether it should be a Holocaust museum or indeed a museum of human rights, as it is now established.
It is equally important that there be a permanent Holocaust gallery in the Canadian Museum for Human Rights. It was the vision of the late Israel Asper in promoting this museum. It was the basis upon which many private sector donors made their contributions to it.
Now you see why it's so s-s-s-s-s-s-special.

Labels: , ,

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home